Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About SahadSalmiT
SahadSalmiT
Getting noticed
Member since Jul 26, 2022
Aug 25 2023
Community Record
20
Posts
1
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Jul 28 2023
6:23 PM
I have mixed office with MR52, MR56 and MR57. What are the configurations that define the High-density setups?
... View more
Jul 28 2023
9:54 AM
Hi Team, There is a new firmware released MR 29.6.1 and noticed something scary "In high capacity wireless networks APs may experience instability when the “Client Balancing” or "Band Steering". 1. Is it something we have to worry about before upgrading? 2. What it really means when it mentioned "In high capacity wireless network" 3. Anyone already upgraded and face any problems? Thanks a million!
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
May 19 2023
4:48 AM
1 Kudo
Hi Team, I am designing a network with 2 x MX450(Warmspare) 2 x MS425 (Stack) some MS250 and APs The question is where I should run DHCP, I have three options 1. Create all VLAN interfaces in MX and run DHCP on MX and leave MS425 as the L2 switch. 2. Enable L3 and create VLAN interface in MS425 and run DHCP in MS425. 3. Enable L3 and create VLAN interfaces in MS425 but relay DHCP to MX. Any idea which option is the best and why?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Topology
Apr 23 2023
10:08 PM
nope, no upstream firewall. All are directly connected to ISP.
... View more
Apr 22 2023
4:16 PM
Thanks, @Brash , if it's still vulnerable to the scenario in question?
... View more
Apr 22 2023
1:05 PM
@alemabrahao Thanks for your reply, do you know any list of security problems that might occur if I used VLAN 1? I am just curious to know the wisdom behind it.
... View more
Apr 22 2023
10:59 AM
this one is bit aggressive and blocks malware and adult content.
... View more
Apr 22 2023
10:57 AM
@LilyVela , @PacerX Sorry guys, what is "Egg found!" means?
... View more
Apr 22 2023
10:56 AM
Hi Guys, I have a question about the best practice around not using VLAN 1. I have VLAN 1 untagged in all trunks between MX and switches with the following. * Do not have any devices. * Don't have any DHCP configured. * Don't have any VLAN interface created. * VLAN 1 is not spanning anywhere except in these trunk ports between MX and switches * Don't have any management traffic (Have separate VLAN for that) * None of the edge ports contain VLAN 1 I have run packet capture with this design then I run another one using VLAN 5 same scenario, since the untagged VLAN is untagged I couldn't see any difference from VLAN 1 to VLAN 5. Should I worry about anything related to security here? , Let me know if I am missing anything.
... View more
Apr 22 2023
10:42 AM
Not at all, and on one site it didn't go offline for a few days and one day suddenly go offline. Reverting to google DNS fixed it immediately.
... View more
Apr 22 2023
10:40 AM
Nope, the company requered to setup 1.1.1.3.
... View more
Apr 20 2023
3:45 PM
Hi Guys, I faced an issue when one of our engineers set the DNS as 1.1.1.3 in DHCP, the Meraki devices received that DNS lost connectivity with the dashboard, once the change reverted it regain the connectivity. I tried to "nslookup" dashboard.meraki.com, api.meraki.com and config.meraki.com with both 8.8.8.8 and 1.1.1.3, seems to be both DNS servers are resolving the DNS. What could go wrong here?
... View more
Apr 20 2023
3:35 PM
yep
... View more
Mar 26 2023
8:05 AM
Thanks @KarstenI
... View more
Mar 26 2023
5:40 AM
Thanks @Brash, ISP side is sorted already and currently working. True that I will never be using 40GB fully in near future ;-). Just designing it for the future so no need to be re-designed any time soon plus I can expand as much as I want. Any other things need to be considered as per your expertise.
... View more
Mar 26 2023
4:10 AM
Hi Team,
I am trying to design a network inspired by Campus Network Model as below. Things I wish to configure is
1. Each MX will have 2 different ISP and configured load-balancing.
2. Each MX will have two downlinks to the core switches and I believe one link will be blocked by STP (keeping it as a failover).
3. MS425 as core switch and stacked.
4. MS425 will act as a router for clients.
5. MS425 configured as a DHCP server.
3. Default route configured to MX for Internet traffic.
4. All edge switches stacked and uplinks are configured with LACP for higher speed.
Any problems I will be running towards with this model? also let me know how I can make this more Rigid.
Thanks in Advance.
The gnomes' hidden egg has been found!
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Topology
Jul 27 2022
7:45 AM
Thanks, guys I got the idea about the firewall throughput, I will be really looking into that. But right now I need to get the best possible design for the time being, if this one works with the settings of STP without any bottleneck then I will go forward with that. If not let me know, please.
... View more
Jul 27 2022
2:31 AM
Thanks, @cmr , I am planning to get 1 Gig from 2 ISP's and load balance, and warm spare with MX100. if I stack all then as an uplink I would only get 1GB right from MX right and there is no way to get LACP between MX and MS for more bandwidth. So if I created a switch with the lowest priority in the above design then I should be fine right?
... View more
Jul 27 2022
1:08 AM
Thanks, Karsteni for your reply, it seems to be interesting. Can I get a more explanation about it, definitely interested to study it and implement. A few questions I have is 1. if I design that way then each client connecting to each MX will be a different VLAN right 2. What if I disable the spanning tree in the uplink to MX and BPDU guard on other ports, I don't require any switch to switch connection.
... View more
Jul 26 2022
11:25 PM
I wish to create a topology that is similar to the below diagram, main use of this network will be the maximum utilization of internet traffic with a maximum of 200 devices. I know the MX 84 currently has a limitation of throughput and it will be replaced with a high-end version later. So topology looks like this Six MS250 series switches are connected with MX via cat6. All uplinks from MS are configured as a trunk and allow all VLAN. BPDU Guard is enabled in access ports. anything I need to be worried about apart from STP and the BPDU guard is enough to protect any unwanted topology changes. Let me know your comments and suggestion.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Topology
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2076 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
