Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About VinoyMohan
VinoyMohan
Getting noticed
Member since Sep 8, 2021
Online
Kudos given to
Community Record
29
Posts
4
Kudos
1
Solution
Badges
2 weeks ago
Hello, I am looking for an option in Meraki dashboard to put a tag or notes for a particular Organization. There is already an option for Network wide but not Organization wide.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
3 weeks ago
Hello Everyone, I am looking for an API that returns which MX is Primary and which is Spare in a Network. Is there a direct API to get that information from Meraki? Thanks in advance
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Auto VPN
-
Client VPN
-
Firewall
-
Other
12-21-2022
03:49 AM
@wwThanks for your reply. I had a look at the packet capture and found out that when the client is using TLSv1, the server is not sending any response and it works perfectly works with TLSv1.2. This does means that Meraki MX doesnot support TLSv1 and how does this works with Internet URL's?
... View more
12-21-2022
02:53 AM
Thanks Green, have already opened a case and they had asked us to change the MTU and still no luck there. Just wanted to check if anyone had faced similar issues with MX recently. The main problem is that any URL within our internal network is not working but internet works fine. In the packet capture also we dont find any issues and external firewall rules are also allowed .
... View more
12-21-2022
02:44 AM
Hello Everyone, We have recently started facing a weird issue that Client is unable to access any of the internal network https URL and internet is working fine. We have tried by taking the packet captures and dont see anything weird in it. Does anyone face these kind of issues. Note: Client is connected to the MX(Spoke) and Spoke is connected to MX(Hub) via Site2Site tunnel. Some Network under the Organization is facing this issue and some networks are working fine. We have even compared the configuration between those working and non working MX and looks exactly similar.
... View more
11-21-2022
12:27 AM
Thanks Karstenl.
... View more
11-20-2022
11:58 PM
Hello Karstenl, Thanks for your response. But is there any other solution other than using the email, as i don't have any possibility to access the email due to some reason.
... View more
11-20-2022
10:53 PM
Hello All, Is there a way to find the license details in a Meraki order before claiming it in the dashboard? Br Vinoy
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Administrators
-
Inventory
-
Licensing
07-21-2022
07:22 AM
Hello Armelin, Even the downgrade to 15.44 didn't really help to get the proper throughput. Really out of options now 😞
... View more
07-21-2022
06:33 AM
Hello Armelin, Thanks for your response. But i have downgraded one of the site to 15.44.3 and still have the same issues.
... View more
07-20-2022
09:45 PM
Not yet Philip. One of the site has been upgraded to 16.16.3 and it didn't really work. Even the Meraki support team is out of options now to resolve this. So they are asking for lot of iperf results to get deeper into it.
... View more
07-20-2022
07:09 AM
I have been facing almost similar throughput issue with MX450 release version 16.16 in 2 sites that is geographically separated. This started since July13th and we don't see any kind of packet loss or jitter in the path, but the throughput is very less around 100Mbps(1Gbps line speed) But when we check the dashboard throughput , it is around 600Mbps. More over when we use a proxy , the speed is decreasing from 100Mbps to 1 Mbps. Anyone facing the similar issues?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Auto VPN
04-13-2022
03:16 AM
Thanks for pointing out the error in the network id. That was the issue, a silly mistake. 🙂
... View more
04-13-2022
02:33 AM
I have an API to create Vlans in a network with type as Appliance, but the same API doesn't work if the network type is Combined. Is there a solution for this? I am using the below API and the error i am getting is "{\"errors\":[\"This endpoint only supports MX networks\"]} https://api.meraki.com/api/v1/networks/"Network_Id"/appliance/vlans Body: { "applianceIp": "x.x.x.x", "id": "1234", "name": "TestVlan", "netid": "net_id", "netname": "abc", "subnet": "x.x.x.x/28" } Thanks in advance.
... View more
04-13-2022
02:27 AM
I have an API to create Vlans in a network with type as Appliance, but the same API doesn't work if the network type is Combined. Is there a solution for this? I am using the below API and the error i am getting is "{\"errors\":[\"This endpoint only supports MX networks\"]} https://api.meraki.com/api/v1/networks/"Network_Id"/appliance/vlans Body: { "applianceIp": "x.x.x.x", "id": "1234", "name": "TestVlan", "netid": "net_id", "netname": "abc", "subnet": "x.x.x.x/28" } Thanks in advance.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
02-10-2022
11:41 PM
Yes, absolutely true. But there is no feature yet and deleting a particular firewall rule using API is also not there right now.
... View more
02-10-2022
05:30 AM
Policy Groups mapping to an L3 firewall rule API URL:https://api.meraki.com/api/v1/networks/{{ network id}}/appliance/firewall/l3FirewallRules { "rules" : [ { "comment" : "Allow TCP traffic to subnet with HTTP servers." , "policy" : "allow" , "protocol" : "tcp" , "destPort" : "443" , "destCidr" : "GRP(9879879879)" , ### 9879879879 is the policy group ID "srcPort" : "Any" , "srcCidr" : "10.10.10.0/24" , "syslogEnabled" : false } ] } Hope this helps
... View more
02-10-2022
05:30 AM
2 Kudos
Policy Object mapping to an L3 firewall rule API URL:https://api.meraki.com/api/v1/networks/{{ network id}}/appliance/firewall/l3FirewallRules { "rules" : [ { "comment" : "Allow TCP traffic to subnet with HTTP servers." , "policy" : "allow" , "protocol" : "tcp" , "destPort" : "443" , "destCidr" : "OBJ(1234567890)" , ### 1234567890 is the policy object ID "srcPort" : "Any" , "srcCidr" : "10.10.10.0/24" , "syslogEnabled" : false } ] }
... View more
02-10-2022
05:29 AM
I dont know somehow my response to your query is getting deleted automatically.
... View more
02-10-2022
03:40 AM
Sure, please find below example for both Policy Object and Groups tagging a particular firewall rule. Policy Object tagging to a firewall rule: API URL: https: //api.meraki.com/api/v1/networks/{{ network id}}/appliance/firewall/l3FirewallRules { "rules" : [ { "comment" : "Allow TCP traffic to subnet with HTTP servers." , "policy" : "allow" , "protocol" : "tcp" , "destPort" : "443" , "destCidr" : "OBJ(1234567890)" , #### 1234567890 is the Policy Object id "srcPort" : "Any" , "srcCidr" : "10.10.10.0/24" , "syslogEnabled" : false } ] } Policy Groups tagging to a firewall rule: API URL: https: //api.meraki.com/api/v1/networks/{{ network id}}/appliance/firewall/l3FirewallRules { "rules" : [ { "comment" : "Allow TCP traffic to subnet with HTTP servers." , "policy" : "allow" , "protocol" : "tcp" , "destPort" : "443" , "destCidr" : "GRP(7894564679)" , #### 7894564679 is the Policy Group id "srcPort" : "Any" , "srcCidr" : "10.10.10.0/24" , "syslogEnabled" : false } ] } Hope this helps
... View more
02-10-2022
01:25 AM
I have found the answer myself. For attaching the Policy Object & Groups we should use the below format in the API call. Policy Object: "destCidr" or " srcCidr" : "OBJ(Policy Object ID)" Policy Object Group: "destCidr" or "srcCidr": "GRP(Policy Group ID)"
... View more
02-10-2022
12:54 AM
I am trying to figure out a way to apply a particular Policy Object/Groups to an L3 firewall rule using API. I can create an L3 firewall rule using CIDR/FQDN etc, but I am unable to map the firewall rule to a Policy Object using API. Any leads will be appreciated.
... View more
Kudos given to
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1017 | 02-10-2022 01:25 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
