The important bit is: 'enabled': False  It is disabled so you can ignore it. ... View more

Hi @Akshay2 Refer to this developer guide for detailed setup - https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/build/servicenowgetting-started/   ... View more

Never did...but I noticed that if a network tag isn't being by any networks, it doesn't show up in the Tags tab in the Org Overview page.  So, that is helpful.  ... View more

I have an MX100 that alerted me about a pending update that was taking place this Sunday.  I checked the forum to see that there were issues (even though the MX100 was not listed as an affected device).  I postponed the upgrade as far as I could.  Then I went into the firmware upgrade page to see that the MX100 model cannot run the firmware it was trying to schedule.  When the reschedule occurs will I have to keep pushing it off or will the MX eventually realize it doesn't support the firmware it is trying to upgrade to?  Thank you for any help you can provide.     ... View more

Congratulations to @iw3ibg, @Jawson, and @ZHM!    ... View more

A bunch of MX68W's and a MX65W were affected.  We don't have any MX64W's running around.     We did open a ticket, and they wanted us to do live packet captures while on the phone with support, and I never got around to doing that.  It was quicker to just add a MR to those production networks, and then upgrade to the 17.x firmware.   ... View more

Hi @NJNetworkGuy100 you could do this a few ways, but it sounds like https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!split-network is the simplest/easiest way.   After doing this, you can delete whichever switch networks are empty.   You could even re-combine the remaining networks (if desired) via https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!combine-organization-networks   Hope this helps! ... View more

FYI, All computers behind MX can no longer install OfficeSetup.exe. I was told it was HTTP Content Caching issue. Will need to upgrade to MX 17.10.5 ... View more

Yep. It went completely retrospectively clean. It's a good day after all. ... View more

Yeah, guess I'll have to bug Meraki to add this feature.  Thanks! ... View more

That is perfect!  Thanks for the explanation.   ... View more

Hi @NetworkDemon I sent you a link via Postal.io to confirm your mailing address and claim your prize. It looks like that link has since expired. I'll connect with you via DM to get your information and resend it!  ... View more

If the other switch supports either CDP or LLDP then it will show up as a diamond icon in the topology of the network. ... View more

Thanks guys.   I think I'll make a wish in Dashboard for L3 hits to be in the summary data like L7, if it happens I assume it'd also appear via API one day.   ... View more

Meraki Support told me the same thing...impossible to do that kind of routing with a simple Hub-Spoke setup.     Yeah, I have a few solutions brewing. The remote MX in the offsite network (if they would even allow that), setup a limited number of Spoke networks as Peers to the same IPSec tunnel, or setup the tunnel on another router or MX on the same LAN subnet as the Hub MX and use static routes to advertise it.   ... View more

The standalone combined network name is limited to 38 characters for the combined network due to the network type suffix (MX, MS, MR) getting appended to the name without visibility. The validation limitation is 50 characters.   I remember that in the past I had problems with devices Meraki to update the config on the dashboard because they had a very large name configured. So just be careful not to cause any kind of problem for you. ... View more

Thanks...the documentation doesn't specify the WAN interfaces, which is why I was a bit confused....MX Firewall Settings - Cisco Meraki   Just trying to get some clarity while we update our network setting standards.   ... View more

Oh, that's a great MS doc...thanks for that link.  Something to discuss with my company's O365 guys to see if they even knew about this for Teams. ... View more

My understanding is that the NBAR categories only function in the "Normal" setting. Group Policy objects do not use the NBAR filtering at this point. The Meraki tech I was talking with didn't know if or when that functionality would arrive.   It would be nice though. We generally use group policy to open or close services and having more granularity would be nice to have there. ... View more

Quite a few Meraki items (lower end PoE switches for instance) have out-done the mother ship and gone straight to 999 days now... 😱 ... View more

If you don't need routing in your setup, the 8 port layer 2 switch is a solid switch. ... View more

Very cool! Thank you for sharing!  I will stay tuned ... View more

Thanks ww proper kind of awesome reply right there  ... View more