Meraki

Community
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

About RajaSekhar

Re: Communication between Meraki VPN connected locations and non Meraki con...

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Jun 19 2020 1:43 AM
‎Jun 19 2020 1:43 AM
Thank you for your inputs. The DOCUMENT shared by you helped & worked.   Regards, RajaSekhar ... View more

Re: Best procedure to follow while implementing HA of MX 250 devices

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Jun 19 2020 1:39 AM
‎Jun 19 2020 1:39 AM
Thank you for the Logical and doable inputs. Interested in knowing how can we minimize 'Client VPN migration' time as the users are spread across geographically.  ... View more

Best procedure to follow while implementing HA of MX 250 devices

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Jun 18 2020 11:54 PM
‎Jun 18 2020 11:54 PM
Hello..Greetings.   We wish to configure HA of MX 250 appliance at our network perimeter. This device is configured as a HUB in the Meraki ORG. Have another MX 250 ready to build HA. Around 300 Client VPN users connect to MX 250 (HUB) for access of servers at DC The site to site VPNs (using MX devices) are configured and connected through SD-WAN Presently we have only one Public WAN IP (configured on WAN port of Primary MX 250) Obtained another pool of public WAN IPs of /29. So that both the MX 250s can have new WAN IP and VIP after this configuration changes. Client VPNs can be configured using VIP after this config change. Can anyone of you suggest a best practice to follow to implement the above with minimal impact to the users?   Thanks in advance. ... View more

Re: Communication between Meraki VPN connected locations and non Meraki con...

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Feb 25 2020 6:40 AM
‎Feb 25 2020 6:40 AM
Thank you. Shall plan for an additional MX as there is no proven option other than it. ... View more

Re: Communication between Meraki VPN connected locations and non Meraki con...

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Feb 25 2020 5:56 AM
‎Feb 25 2020 5:56 AM
Helpful document. Thank you. Is there a way to address this without an additional MX ? Observed that all the Spoke MXs have the route to AWS i.e NON-Meraki IPSec VPN is visible. Of course, they cannot connect directly to AWS. ... View more

Communication between Meraki VPN connected locations and non Meraki connect...

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Feb 25 2020 4:18 AM
‎Feb 25 2020 4:18 AM
We use Meraki MX 250 at Hub and MX 64 / 65 at spoke locations. Connectivity is seamless and works well. We created a non-Meraki VPN between MX 250 (from Hub location) and AWS Cloud i.e IPsec VPN. Able to reach AWS IP subnet from HUB, but not from spokes (MX 64 / 65), whereas all the spokes can reach the HUB without any issue. AWS confirmed that they are allowing all the subnets of ours i.e 192.168.0.0 Can anyone advise? ... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.