@AnonymousI am using MS 10.45 for the switch and MR 25.13 for the AP... What versions are you using? ... View more

I believe the reason is that if you remove the cable, the port is still active, so to speak. It is not like you're issuing a "shutdown" on the port. The way to clear the mismatch usually is to correct it, so I guess when you change the VLAN, because the port is not connected to anything, it will accept the change and clear the error. When you change the VLAN back to original VLAN, again, there's nothing to mismatch with on the other side until you connect the cable again and the error appears again.   This is what I think is going on, let me know what you think? ... View more

@BrechtSchampI know, right! 🙂 I think if they had provided a better answer, such as @MerakiDave 's reply above, I would have been more satisfied, wouldn't you?   @PhilipDAth, @BlakeRichardson  Thank you, I see what you mean now 🙂   I guess we'll just have to accept it for what it is and live with it, ay? 😉  ... View more

@BlakeRichardson- do you mean the Summary Report on the dashboard? I have already checked there and I seem to have a lot of data when I select the AP under the Networks dropdown, but if I change to the switch, I have no data at all...   I understand that you're saying about bandwidth, but should this affect the throughput of the switch to the Meraki cloud? ... View more

I have already tested by unplugging the AP and testing. I also tested by disconnecting the devices from the switch and plugging them directly into the router. I had the same result. It makes no difference whether the AP is plugged into the switch or not, the switch always shows around 9Mbps throughput...   I just find it strange and I can't believe Meraki won't provide a proper explanation or a reason for this. Even if it is down to the slower CPU, surely throughput is throughput... I mean, when there were no other devices connected to the switch, technically, there should be not that much load on the CPU, right? I understand it still has to process the data from the router, but using only 1 port and still getting the same throughput? If it was down to CPU, then we should at least see the throughput increase significantly? Or am I wrong?   Sorry, just thinking out loud 🙂  ... View more

Hi,   I am currently seeing the same issue on my MS220-8P.  I have a very easy setup - a router -> Switch -> AP.  Apart from this, I have 2 end devices connected to the switch. --- Apr 9 22:57:34 Port STP change Port 8 disabled→designated Apr 9 22:57:34 Port status change port: 8, old: down, new: 100fdx Apr 9 22:56:11 Port STP change Port 8 designated→disabled Apr 9 22:56:11 Port status change port: 8, old: 100fdx, new: down Apr 9 22:56:08 Port STP change Port 8 disabled→designated Apr 9 22:56:08 Port status change port: 8, old: down, new: 100fdx Apr 9 22:56:07 Port STP change Port 8 designated→disabled Apr 9 22:56:07 Port status change port: 8, old: 100fdx, new: down Apr 9 22:55:51 Port STP change Port 8 disabled→designated Apr 9 22:55:51 Port status change port: 8, old: down, new: 100fdx Apr 9 22:55:26 Port STP change Port 7 disabled→designated Apr 9 22:55:26 Port status change port: 7, old: down, new: 100fdx Apr 9 22:55:17 Port STP change Port 7 designated→disabled Apr 9 22:55:16 Port status change port: 7, old: 100fdx, new: down Apr 9 22:55:10 Port STP change Port 7 disabled→designated Apr 9 22:55:10 Port status change port: 7, old: down, new: 100fdx Apr 9 22:51:39 Port STP change Port 8 designated→disabled Apr 9 22:51:39 Port status change port: 8, old: 100fdx, new: down --- One endpoint recently connected to port 7, AP is on port 1, another endpoint connected on port 6. Port 8 is connected to the router that connects to the rest of the world...   Let me know if you need more information from me.   Kind Regards, Emanuil Svetlinski ... View more