The Meraki Community
Register or Sign in
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • About cvwordragen
cvwordragen

cvwordragen

Here to help

Member since Apr 30, 2019

‎12-22-2022

Carlo van Wordragen

Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Kudos given to
User Count
ecce
ecce
1
Meraki-Training
Meraki Employee Meraki-Training
1
Bruce
Bruce
1
View All

Community Record

4
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions

Badges

ECMS2
CMNA
Meraki FIT Level One
Meraki FIT Level Two
Meraki Master
5th Birthday View All
Latest Contributions by cvwordragen
  • Topics cvwordragen has Participated In
  • Latest Contributions by cvwordragen

Re: Non meraki Peer site to site with Azure VMX

by cvwordragen in Security / SD-WAN
‎07-04-2022 06:16 AM
‎07-04-2022 06:16 AM
I have the same problem here. I am still investigating. It seems that in the dashboard for the Meraki vMX the non-Meraki can be configured, but that the settings at the system level (Azure VM) are not accepted. After all, it is a fully secure and closed VM image ... View more

Two vMX appliances in Azure - two BGP peers with Azure Route Server

by cvwordragen in Security / SD-WAN
‎12-10-2021 08:31 AM
‎12-10-2021 08:31 AM
Does anyone have experience with Active/Active BGP Peering for two vMX devices in Azure? I am able to create one BGP peer between an Azure Route Server and one vMX. But not two BGP peers for active/active and redundancy. Short description: vMX1 <-> peer1 <-> Azure Route Server (ARS) vMX2 <-> peer2 <-> Azure Route Server (ARS) The problem I'm running into. The Azure Route Server has a /27 subnet, for example 10.0.0.0/27 In order for routing from Meraki SD-WAN to succeed, this prefix must be added as a local prefix on both vMX devices. And so the SD-WAN/AutoVPN recognizes two routes to the same IP prefix, but only one is used. In the Azure VM at virtual interface, Effective Routes, there is only one route to one of the vMX devices. But there should be two in the routing table to work as ECMP (Equal Cost Multipath) ... View more
Labels:
  • Labels:
  • Azure

Re: Client VPN Firewall Ports

by cvwordragen in Security / SD-WAN
‎11-22-2020 07:34 AM
‎11-22-2020 07:34 AM
Today I had the same issue. Port Forwarding UDP 500 and UDP 4500 to the inside LAN-adres of the hub will do. Advise: test your Client VPN with a iPad or iPhone. This worked for me, immediately. With the Apple clients you will see UDP 500 and UDP 4500 is okay. MS Windows has problems with NAT-T (NAT Traversal) for ages. ... View more

Re: Maths number of tunnels full mesh and hub and spoke

by cvwordragen in Security / SD-WAN
‎10-26-2020 07:06 AM
‎10-26-2020 07:06 AM
I case of an MX appliance on a spoke site with a cellular interface for back-up (e.g. MX67C), what is the number of links (L2)? I would say the VPN-tunnel over the cellular networks is only active at failover, so remains L2=1 (equal number of physical links). Is that correct ? ... View more
Kudos given to
User Count
ecce
ecce
1
Meraki-Training
Meraki Employee Meraki-Training
1
Bruce
Bruce
1
View All
Powered by Khoros
custom.footer.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Cisco Privacy
  • Khoros Privacy
  • Privacy Settings
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 Meraki