I agree.  If we had required faster uplinks, we would have replaced the Meraki's with another firewall.  Fortunately we don't need the extra bandwidth, so it doesn't matter for our use case.  But the companies that make their own chips are able to offload some CPU intensive things to ASIC chips.  That is the way that all manufacturers should be headed and hopefully Cisco will instead of trying to cram everything into an intel system on a chip.  Hardware $ for $ Meraki is far from competitive.  But the software is what makes us stick around.  Too bad the software stack can't run on another large brand's hardware, then we could FortiMeraki or MerakiGate.... UnifiMeraki....  ... View more

Note that a MX in concentrator mode can advertise a static route.  Check out this post I did describing how. https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/Vmx-100-routing/m-p/18526/highlight/true#M4455   As @GreenMan says, the OSPF support only advertises AutoVPN routes.  I does not listen to routes.   If you really want to go down this path you should open a ticket with support and ask to go on the BGP beta program, and change to using BGP.  The BGP support is two-way. ... View more

@Aaron_Wilson: the reason for having multiple clients under the same organization is so that we can make use of AutoVPN to overcome the inability to use hostnames in VPN configurations for our clients that have dynamic public IP's.   ... View more