Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About gmartine
gmartine
Conversationalist
Member since Aug 7, 2018
Aug 20 2018
Community Record
10
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Aug 20 2018
3:43 PM
@PhilipDAth yes. I guess it is an option. Sor far o guess the option is supported via the CLI but it is not visible within the controller https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeSwitch/How-do-I-manually-adjust-port-priority-in-STP/td-p/2389457 Is that a better option?
... View more
Aug 20 2018
1:01 PM
@PhilipDAth I was trying to put my internet traffic in two separate vlans. The issue I am facing now is that switch usw-b is using port#1 as designated port. Port#1 is my connecting to my ISP and it is untagged. Ideally (and w/o modifying my topology) I would like to have port#4 as the designated port. It seems due to spanning tree tie breakers port#1 is designated because it is the lowest port number. Any idea other than either adjusting the path or switching the link between switches from port#4 to port#1?
... View more
Aug 17 2018
3:18 PM
@PhilipDAth After updating my HA topology to what you can see at the end of this thread (see topology with additional red links): https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/MX84-HA-setup-tagged-WAN-ports/td-p/24988 I am now seeing some really weird messages on my log. I assume those messages are not harmful, right? What I think is happening is that the Internet traffic is landing VLAN1 and it is getting mixed up with my management traffic
... View more
Aug 15 2018
8:12 PM
After adding the new links the setup is working as expected. The only drawback is that switch usw-b sees usw-a as its uplink through the ISP connection. The reason is because the spare mx84 I believe
... View more
Aug 9 2018
10:10 AM
@PhilipDAth Sorry I forgot to add the screenshot from the switch point of view
... View more
Aug 9 2018
10:08 AM
@PhilipDAth I completed the connections as previously shown on my earlier post. I can now see from usw-a the other switch usw-c. I assume the mx84 is bridging all LAN ports. Is that the correct assumption?
... View more
Aug 8 2018
7:55 PM
@PhilipDAthI guess after all I was missing a connection in my diagram. I will have run another pair of cables just to carry the management traffic. @PhilipDAth wrote: Put the ISP traffic in one VLAN and present it to the WAN ports, and management traffic in another VLAN and present it to the LAN ports. Here is the diagram. I will use port#6 of the MX84 for both active/spare
... View more
Aug 8 2018
10:37 AM
@PhilipDAth I can’t put not ISP traffic and management traffic in the same VLAN. That is my problem @PhilipDAth wrote: Port 1 (the ISP links) does not need to be tagged. Just put it into a VLAN and present that to the WAN ports of the MX.
... View more
Aug 7 2018
4:21 AM
@PhilipDAth the issue here is that the port#1 for both usw-a and usw-b is not tagged. At the same time devices a and b, need to connect to the Internet for management purposes but they need to be behind the firewall. I have the option to tag the management traffic for devices a and b. I forgot to say devices a, b, c and d are managed layer2 switches. Any ideas?
... View more
Aug 7 2018
12:30 AM
usw-a, usw-b, usw-c, usw-d they are all UniFi USW-24 switches. Boxes in the middle are Meraki firewalls MX84 working on HA (active/backup), where top is active and bottom is backup. usw-a & usw-b (Port#1) are ISP connections. Application server will sit behind usw-c & usw-d roght Noel the switches are managed static (public dmz zone). How can I get the wan ports to allow packets in two tsgged vlans? Let’s say Vlan 100 Internet and Vlan11 (tagged) managemet traffic? Any ideas ?
... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
