Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About lpopejoy
lpopejoy
A model citizen
Member since Sep 1, 2017
Thursday
Community Record
190
Posts
86
Kudos
2
Solutions
Badges
Apr 23 2020
3:30 AM
I tried to use join several ways, and it wouldn’t work for me. GetOrganizationNetworks returns multiple values for you, right?
... View more
Apr 22 2020
5:40 AM
2 Kudos
@Sriram Sure: The real key is to take output of getOrg and split it (this is only needed if you have multiple organizations), run it into a limiter to not hit API limits, and then run from that into a function. The function right before "getNetwork" is this: msg.organizationId=msg.payload.id return msg; This sets the msg.organizationID that getnetworks is looking for from the value that was obtained in the getOrganizations query. Hope that helps!
... View more
Apr 21 2020
4:08 PM
I am admittedly new to node red... just as a warning. 🙂 We manage multiple organizations. I have the output of GetOrganizations, and am splitting that and running getNetworks. I need to collect all the JSON outputs of each getNetworks call and join them and send it over to a different function that harvests analytics data. right now, each network goes to the Analytics function individually. I need it to wait, and then go at the same time... does that make sense? Thanks for any advice!!
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Code Sample
Mar 10 2020
9:04 AM
Would love to see this as well. There is some basic data like this under Organization->Summary Reports, but no way to get proactively alerted on it. You would need to leverage the asset and write your own automation around it, sadly.
... View more
Feb 20 2020
6:17 AM
Feb 20 2020
6:17 AM
1 Kudo
I wish Meraki had a status page (or maybe they do and I don't know it...) Anyway, dashboard down for you guys too? East coast USA here.
... View more
Jan 24 2020
10:27 AM
@jdsilva I agree....I made a wish this AM. In my experience, those just go into a black hole. My 30000 requests for better real time visibility of client traffic has been ignored so far...
... View more
Jan 24 2020
10:27 AM
@cmr that's the issue, link is saturated. We are already dropping the packets so no issues there.
... View more
Jan 24 2020
3:43 AM
@BlakeRichardson Yes, which is kind of my recommendation thus this post. However, I wanted to keep more of a "primary w/ failover" model. Otherwise, nothing will prevent a student from gaining access to a staff laptop at some point and doing a quick "whatsmyip" and starting the attack on the 2nd connection. Won't take long for them to realize their DoS isn't working... However if I leverage a failover connection, according to the comments on this post, it isn't going to fail over. And that's a bit of a problem!
... View more
Jan 24 2020
3:39 AM
Outside the school. A single external host is sending 250 mb/s of UDP traffic to our public IP. The IP is owned by Digital Ocean, and I have contacted their abuse contact... so far nothing. However, even after that is taken down, nothing keeps it from starting back up again from another source. No public services hosted @ the school, so that isn't a concern. We just need a reliable internet connection.
... View more
Jan 23 2020
5:08 PM
@BlakeRichardson ...well... I've done that. Had a static IP, dropped it. However, the DHCP lease doesn't expire so it remains pretty "static". Ive asked they do a force release to allow us to get a new one, but they don't have a way to do that. They suggest leaving the modem unplugged for 24 hours so someone else gets our lease. 🙂 ...that aside, this is a targeted attack. aka students goofing off and thinking this is the best use of their school's IT budget. When I did switch from static to dhcp (and thus change the IP), it only "fixed" the issue for about a week.
... View more
Jan 23 2020
4:13 PM
...and the attacks last beween 15-60 min at a time, so it isn't like we are talking about 8 hours of solid down time. Which means by the time I access the dashboard, update, and the device downloads the config, the issue might have taken care of itself.... 🙂
... View more
Jan 23 2020
4:11 PM
@PhilipDAth I was afraid of that. We could switch manually, but then thats taking the bet that the device will actually be able to download configs, which it may, but it will probably take forever.
... View more
Jan 23 2020
3:25 PM
I have a situation where our Wan1 is having extended periods of very high latency (>500ms). The MX is not completely dropping offline, but the internet becomes unusable. The issue is happening due to a DoS attack (250 mb/s of UDP traffic coming in on port 80). I would like to hook up WAN2 to a 4g gateway that I have as a failover, however, I'm concerned that the MX won't fail over since it is still "connected". Can I use performance classes to force a failover when latency exceeds 200ms? The wording on that page seems to imply that this only impacts VPN traffic, so I was unsure if this would help since we do not use VPN.
... View more
Dec 11 2019
5:38 AM
1 Kudo
We desperately need more real time data in terms of hardware utilization and client bandwidth consumption on the MX. Client VPN needs development - maybe SSL VPN option? SSL packet inspection *Oh! And make the "inbound firewall" under site to site VPN ACTUALLY work! Why is it in the GUI if is non-functional? (reference note here: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Site-to-site_VPN/Site-to-site_VPN_Firewall_Rule_Behavior)
... View more
Oct 16 2019
7:59 AM
Thanks @jdsilva . It seems really strange that they leave disfunctional GUI elements in the page. I understand that VPN traffic should be stopped closer to the source - my preference as well. Just not an option in this case. It does say that this error will be resolved in a future dashboard update - does that mean this functionality will begin working at some point? Anyone inside Meraki know when this bug is slated to be resolved?
... View more
Oct 16 2019
6:16 AM
I need all users to have access to a 3rd party subnet. However, I do not want any of the remote subnet to have access to the us. We are behind an MX84, remote is an AWS VPN which we have no control over. There is a site-to-site inbound firewall, but it doesn't appear to work: Just wondering if anyone else has run into this and how it was solved.
... View more
Oct 16 2019
6:08 AM
Even though it says it is only SUPPORTED for Auto-VPN, support can still enable the feature for you (I'm nearly 100% sure we have this working somewhere). I THINK it still works, they just don't support it.
... View more
Oct 15 2019
6:09 AM
1 Kudo
That's awesome! Is that going to be released with the 15.x branch?
... View more
In any case, I would say it is still sad that a $150 AP out-performs a $650 AP: https://alethea.in/wp-content/uploads/Ubiquiti_HD_Test_Report.pdf
... View more
Sep 13 2019
5:40 AM
1 Kudo
Meraki support has gone from "some of the best" to "some of the worst", IMO. I'm really hoping that this is a temporary issue due to scaling/growing pains. But it IS very frustrating.
... View more
Jul 13 2019
5:19 AM
3 Kudos
100% agree. Meraki decided making phones and video cameras was a better idea than adding value to the current product. Love Meraki, but it does seem a bit as if they have lost sight of what’s important. VPN is a CONSTANT source of problems and we get more tickets and complaints about that than anything else.
... View more
Jun 10 2019
10:42 AM
That can't be true. I've got devices reporting "100" but the Org->performance overview barely shows 5. The API endpoint doesn't have a default documented or a way to change it, but it seems poorly documented.
... View more
Jun 10 2019
10:21 AM
Does anyone know what time frame this device performance endpoint is for? I think it is for the last minute, but I was trying to confirm that: https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api/#/rest/api-endpoints/devices/get-network-device-performance
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Dashboard API
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3175 | Jun 7 2021 7:11 AM | |
| 20704 | Jun 30 2018 9:00 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 19863 | |
| 8 | 4425 | |
| 4 | 5655 | |
| 3 | 1936 | |
| 3 | 2472 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
