Sonicwall???   ... View more

It sure is a good thing they put a couple of big honking antennas on it then eh?   ... View more

A warm spare MX does't have any IP addresses on the LAN side... So about the best you can do it try and poll the WAN side. You can do an ICMP poll of the WAN interface. I'm not sure if SNMP is available on the WAN (i'd hope the answer to that is "No"). ... View more

As soon as there's a mailing list for this @CameronMoody you let me know please. I'd love to see this hit my inbox every month. Or RSS feed... 🙂 ... View more

Gross. I just check my bigger networks and I don't have any switches reporting this that I can find. Thanks for the heads up though guys. ... View more

OK, only other trick I got up my sleeve is make sure the Windows Firewall allows it. There's rules in both inbound and outbound.   ... View more

This has worked for me in the past:   https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Client_VPN/Client_VPN_OS_Configuration#Windows_10     ... View more

How's the signal strength at these locations?  ... View more

Jelly of that fridge!  ... View more

    Oooh! Snazzy new bottles this month. Thanks @CarolineS !   @ ... View more

Call me crazy, but I strongly suspect Meraki's app developers have been busy on other things...     ... View more

Nope 😞   @Drew wrote:   PS, Meraki PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE treat MR30H LAN ports the same as MS switch ports!!!! This ^^ ... View more

Your problem is NAT.   By default the MX will NAT all traffic going between WAN and LAN. The MX is not a router, and does not behave as such...  Unless you call into support and get them to enable the very new beta feature No-NAT. You'll have to move to a beta firmware, and get the views enabled in the dashboard, but then you can use the MX as a traditional router. ... View more

OK, well nevermind then!  ... View more

Actually, I think you both might be correct here.   If I'm following correctly, @RVilhelmsen you're talking about multiple locations and therefore using a helper-address to forward DHCP requests upstream somewhere. In this scenario the ports that require trust aren't going to change at a given site even if you change the DHCP server, or change its location.    But if that's the case then even if you change the DHCP server, the MAC that you need to trust isn't going to change anyway. The local gateway will be doing the DHCP forwarding, so the switches at a given location will always see the MAC of the gateway as the DHCP server regardless of where the gateway is configured for helper-address. So in this case you still set the MAC once, and then just change the helper-address as required.    This breaks down at the "HQ" site where the actual DHCP servers reside though, and for that LAN you'd have to modify the MAC allowed under DHCP snooping.     *Edit, sorry I have DNS on the brain from another issue today. Edited this to read DHCP. ... View more

Well done to you too @BlakeRichardson. Welcome to the club! ... View more

Well done @PhilipDAth! That's a crazy effort on your part.  ... View more

I don't think I would say they don't work together. It'd be more that you have to manage them separately. You would manage the Go AP in the AP, and the MX in the dashboard. But there's no reason why a Go AP won't fuction behind an MX assuming everything is configured correctly. ... View more

@Abuse_Tracker Don't say I didn't warn you... 😛   Super simple CLI MX load grapher. This requires the asciichartpy and meraki modules (you can install both via pip). It'll run for 60 minutes, pulling the load value once a minute and adding it to the graph.      #!/usr/bin/python3 from curses import wrapper from asciichartpy import plot from meraki import meraki import time print("Hello and welcome to the MX Utilization Grapher Utility - Curses Edition") api_key = input("Please enter your API key: ") network_id = input("Please enter the Network ID for the MX: ") serial_number = input("Please enter the serial number of the MX: ") mx_perf = [0] def main(stdscr): stdscr.addstr(0, 0, "Initializing.") stdscr.refresh() for each in range(0, 3): perf_score = meraki.getmxperf(api_key, network_id, serial_number, suppressprint=True) mx_perf.append(perf_score['perfScore']) time.sleep(1) stdscr.addstr(".") stdscr.refresh() for each in range(1, 60): # Change 60 to however long, in minutes you want to run this perf_score = meraki.getmxperf(api_key, network_id, serial_number, suppressprint=True) mx_perf.append(perf_score['perfScore']) stdscr.clear() stdscr.addstr(0, 0, plot(mx_perf)) # display a counter to show how many minutes the graph has been running stdscr.addstr(str(each)) stdscr.refresh() # control how wide the displayed graph is if len(mx_perf) > 60: mx_perf.pop(1) # Sleep for 60 seconds # Perf Score is only updated once a minute anyway time.sleep(60) wrapper(main)     ... View more

Most likely the switch is seeing broadcast traffic from those clients. ... View more

I've got as far as creating an MS120-24P stencil, but that's the only one I've needed to put into a diagram so far so it's the only one I've created. I can put it up in dropbox if you guys want it.     ... View more

@CarolineS Yes, it does look like my resignation from Meraki was accepted and my employment has now concluded. So long to all my fellow colleagues! I barely got a chance to really know you all!  ... View more

Huh. Weird. I see it in both the full badge list and in my profile page. Maybe that's why it think I only have 6 badges?   ... View more