I go for the same answer as B)ruce ... 😉 ... View more

I have not seen anything other than the MX sizing guide: https://meraki.cisco.com/product-collateral/mx-sizing-guide But it looks like that these values come quite close to the reality. For me, I typically operate my MXes with the security-ruleset because they are much broader than the others. Although I never found MX-specific implementation information, I would expect that it is based on the Talos base-configuration: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/firepower-ngfw/214405-what-are-the-metrics-used-to-determine-t.html   ... View more

This is a really hard one (EDIT: no, not at all)! A) Could be. If I want to have independent Auto-VPN domains, I need separate organisations. B) That won't work C) The device-limit per network (is it still 1000 devices?) will not change regardless how many organisations you have. And the answer is not referring to the organisation-limit of 25k (same here, still in place?) devices. BTW: is there a documentation if there are any Meraki-networks that big? D) Well, it would give you the MSP-navigation. But for which benefit?  I would expect the right answer to be A) I was kind of blind and was reading that it was about splitting the organisation into multiple organisations ... OMG ... So here we go: A) No, one organisation is one AutoVPN-Domain. B) No, the date will not change. C) Yes, it will give you n* the device limit per network up to the organisation-limit. D) No, as this is only for multiple organisations.  So the only hard part was reading the question correctly. That can also give you a "fail" for a real exam ... ... View more

I have no solution, but adding devices with the Meraki App could be a workaround that makes entering them easier. ... View more

Just tested a couple of MXes and all are fine. These devices have a connection to the "Europe" Dashboard. ... View more

I would expect something like this in the future because the MX is basically capable of doing this. For SD-WAN there is the Application-aware local breakout which is nearly the same. It "just" has to be adopted for internet-traffic. But if it will be implemented, I fear that Meraki wants the SD-WAN license for this ... ... View more

@Inderdeep wrote: I am confused between option A and B. but as expert @DarrenOC  @KarstenI says B, so it should be B of course 🙂  This approach will not help you in the real exam ... 😉 ... View more

I really had to scratch my head to understand what the provided answers mean, but: - We can rule out A.) and C.) as there is no implicit or default deny. - It can not be D.) as the L3 rules are processed first The Answer has to be B.) But I still have no idea how to consistently map this answer to the documented processing flow: https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Layer_3_and_7_Firewall_Processing_Order#MX_Processing_Flow_Diagram ... View more

Yes, works! What is your problem? ... View more

Did you open a case for that? This bug is quite severe and hopefully gets fixed fast when Meraki is aware of this. ... View more

I hope that v16 goes GA really fast, the AnyConnect PLUS license is typically quite cheap. ... View more

@Bruce , your Link does not work, but probably it's this statement: An AnyConnect Plus termed license will be required to use AnyConnect on the MX when MX16.X firmware goes GA. Until that time, if an MX upgrades to MX16, AnyConnect will be available as an option. If a license is not linked when MX16 goes GA, AnyConnect will become unusable until a license is applied. More details on applying licenses will be available soon.   ... View more

When I configure remotely a stack the cables are typically already connected by the on-site technician. I do not remember it not to be green when I start with it. But I would not vouch for it. After configuring, it often turns temporary orange complaining about wrong DNS or VLAN. ... View more

@AB_LaDigue67 wrote: Maybe you are overthinking it?  Yes, I heard that before .. But it really was only a flaw in my logic!   It has to be a stack as the uplink port has to be available. If it would not be a stack, the uplink-port had to be on this device. ... View more

I am not sure if this question is really accurate. Why? I assume that only one answer is correct as there is no "choose two". Based on the port-icons, a) and b) are correct answers. But if you only have to choose one, it has to be d) as c) could als be correct. But it doesn't have to be because just connecting the stack-cables doesn't make it a stack-member. And again, I don't get the two hints above ... 😪😫    BTW: The answer is song four on side one of "The Miracle". (Ok, the millennials will now say "side one???" what is he talking about??? ...) ... View more

I think we should end the contest right now!  😀 ... View more

@MacEdge-Dan It's not cleaned up until you have removed the Unify-Box ... 😉 ... View more

@AB_LaDigue67 wrote: Prince Andrew and Prince Charles That's a good one! But I think Prinz Andrew first has to kill five people in front of him. 🙂 ... View more

@cmr wrote: Aren't they both the same number (or is my research not up to standard....) 😉 Where did you research? https://www.mavs.com/team/roster/tyrell-terry/ https://www.mavs.com/team/roster/trey-burke/   ... View more

Tyrell Terry and Trey Burke ... View more

I go with: e) the answer is basically "c" but this time our developers did not remember what the word Meraki stands for and decided to present a meaningless error-message (as quite often). ... View more