Apr 14 2023
5:55 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 14 2023
5:55 AM
High CPU utilization on MR76
Hi Team,
We are connecting a wireless sensor (Non Meraki) which supports 802.11b/g/n (2.4GHz) to Meraki MR76.
When we connect the sensor to MR76 immediately the CUP utilization of MR76 is goes more than 75 to 80%.
Anyone facing same kind of issue? Or anyone have any idea on same?
5 Replies 5
Apr 14 2023
8:15 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 14 2023
8:15 AM
How are you monitoring the CPU utilization on a MR ?
Apr 14 2023
9:04 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 14 2023
9:04 AM
Perhaps he means channel utilization... Which in my mind makes sense, likely the 2.4 sensor is nasty chatty....
Apr 23 2023
10:28 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 23 2023
10:28 PM
You are right. Cisco TAC has suggested some procedure. Accordingly customer has observed high channel utilization.
Apr 23 2023
10:26 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 23 2023
10:26 PM
Allow some time. My customer has prepared one document. Will attach here by today.
Apr 14 2023
10:12 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 14 2023
10:12 AM
Could you share a print screen please?
I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.
Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4815/f48150dc8ff4f1f05b359857e3f1e27188e06566" alt=""
Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.