Replacing 2 stacked MS425-16 with 2 stacked C9300X-24Y

Colin-D
Conversationalist

Replacing 2 stacked MS425-16 with 2 stacked C9300X-24Y

Hello, hoping someone can point me at the right documenation to come up with a plan here. 

 

We have 2 stacked MS425016s for our core switching, I need to replace them, and it shows the C9300X-24Y-M as the replacements, so we have 2 of those I want to deploy as a stack. The documentation for cloning and replacing stacked switches doesnt apply to the C9300s, and I can't find any walkthroughs of the best way to do it with the least amount of downtime, and the least amount of rebuilding configurations by hand. 

 

I'm new to the Meraki world and everything else has been really straightforward but this jump looks like a pain. 

6 Replies 6
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal

You can certainly clone the settings, but my suggestion is to create a new Network, reproduce the same settings for the new stack of switches, perform tests to validate that they are working properly, and then schedule a maintenance window to replace the equipment.

This will be much safer.

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Colin-D
Conversationalist

So, I'm right in thinking that I can't clone the settings then replace one switch at a time in the stack? Our main reason for having the stack is the redundancy because it is used for emergency services. When I started reviewing the documentation for replacing switches in a stack I was excited, now I'm pretty much dreading it 🙂

Mloraditch
Kind of a big deal

No the models are not compatible for stacking. That's pretty much universal in switching. Only like models can be in a physical stack together. The only part of the settings that you can just move are the Layer 3 settings (and they would need to be in the same network for that to work). Everything else has to be cloned either manually or via the API.

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
Colin-D
Conversationalist

Ok I'll start researching that then, Thanks to all!

cmr
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I think you'd be best to build them alongside, for a 24/7 operation I'd set the 9300s up as pure layer 2, with a transit VLAN between the stacks.  You can then move each physical connection and also each VLAN interface from one stack to the other with minimal downtime until there are no more connections of either type on the MS425s.

If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
Main10ence
Meraki Employee
Meraki Employee

I agree with @cmr.

 

However, first and foremost, bring the C9300s online individually and allow them to connect to the M.Dashboard before building the stack.

.ılı.ılı. Cisco Meraki
Network Support Engineer

"The future favors the bold."
Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.