Nov 7 2018
12:17 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nov 7 2018
12:17 PM
OSPF static route redistribution on MS switch
In my current Cisco switching environment, I re-distribute static routes into our OSPF instance. I create a prefix list, and have a route map that references the prefix list, then re-distribute the route map in the OSPF config.
Can an MS switch re-distribute a static route into OSPF?
Solved! Go to solution.
1 Accepted Solution
Nov 7 2018
12:25 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
5 Replies 5
Nov 7 2018
12:25 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nov 7 2018
1:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nov 7 2018
1:18 PM
Thank you very much!
We don't have any Meraki switches, yet. We're in the evaluation phase right now, and that's one feature we need in any future switch purchase.
Nov 7 2018
3:14 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nov 7 2018
3:14 PM
Just make sure you get the ones that support it. I think its MS250 and up.
https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_datasheet_ms.pdf
https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_datasheet_ms.pdf
Nov 13 2018
9:31 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nov 13 2018
9:31 AM
@CML_Todd Be sure to get a demo and test it in your lab. We do some redistribution on the MS420s and they don't always act they way you think when you make a change to a route you are injecting into OSPF.
Nov 13 2018
11:10 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nov 13 2018
11:10 AM
Thanks for the heads ups Zilla! I definitely plan on getting a demo.

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.