Jul 14 2019
11:19 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jul 14 2019
11:19 PM
Dynamic ARP Inspection on MS 120 Does not working
1 Accepted Solution
Jul 14 2019
11:20 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jul 14 2019
11:20 PM
Correct. It is only available on the layer three switches.
5 Replies 5
Jul 14 2019
11:20 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jul 14 2019
11:20 PM
Correct. It is only available on the layer three switches.
Jul 15 2019
2:25 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jul 15 2019
2:25 AM
if you are running MS120 then your MX would be probably working as L3 Gateway. Check on your MX ARP table.
This feature is unsupported by MS120
Jul 28 2019
11:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jul 28 2019
11:18 PM
Thank you,
But I could not find any Dynamic ARP Inspection on MX series, It is just L3 switches capability I think. 🙂
kav noroozi
Jul 15 2019
9:23 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jul 15 2019
9:23 AM
Not supported on the MS120 model.
Supported Models are listed in this document and more info regarding the feature.
https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Other_Topics/Dynamic_ARP_Inspection
Jul 28 2019
11:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jul 28 2019
11:18 PM
Re: Dynamic ARP Inspection on MS 120 Does not working
I could not find any Dynamic ARP Inspection on MX series, It is just L3 switches capability I think. Smiley Happy
I could not find any Dynamic ARP Inspection on MX series, It is just L3 switches capability I think. Smiley Happy
kav noroozi

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.