Vrfs on MX

Kwame
New here

Vrfs on MX

Hi,

Is it possible to add multiple VRFs to a Meraki MX, similar to what can be done on a router or a firewall? If not, is this a feature that Meraki is considering adding to the MX in the future?

Thank you.

 

Regards,

Kwame.

12 Replies 12
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

No, it's not. The MX does not support VRFs.

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
KarstenI
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Put that request in the "Give your feedback" box on the dashboard and describe your use case. 

But don't hold your breath for this feature. I assume the "typical" Meraki customer doesn't need any VRFs.

Inderdeep
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

No man, no VRFs support yet

Regards/Inder
Cisco IT Blogs awarded in 2020 & 2021
www.thenetworkdna.com
rhbirkelund
Kind of a big deal

Meraki currently does not have support for VRFs. However the last I heard, they are currently working on implementing VRF support (In a VRFlite-version), and that it should be coming soon.

I think this was showcased on one of the latest Tech Field Days.

 

image.png

 

https://youtu.be/gflqOvn6ipY?si=OlCablFB-bHGttKr

 

LinkedIn ::: https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/

Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution 🙂

All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.

I'm almost sure this doesn't include MX.

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.

VRFs are mentionend in regards to Adaptive Policy, and one the the requirements for Adaptive Policy is an MX. So I'd assume there is going to be some sort of functionality within the MX.

 

But still, this is still rather new, and Meraki has been keeping rather quiet about the feature, so we'll just have to see how the implementation is going to work out.

LinkedIn ::: https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/

Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution 🙂

All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.

I heard the same thing. No hard commitment on that one , maybe MX 20 or MX 21.

PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I'll take MX25 if we are getting lottery tickets.

KarstenI
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

And for the switching line, they were only talking about Catalyst-M and not the "normal" MS line. 

rhbirkelund
Kind of a big deal

If you watch closely in the video from Tech Field Day as well, you may notice some other features, that they seem to be working on. E.g. Org-Wide L7 rules. Or at least, I haven't seen it before.

Interesting to see when that will happen. 🙂

LinkedIn ::: https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/

Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution 🙂

All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.

Lots of good stuff is coming up. Org-Wide L7 , then L3 rules will be game changer !

Apologies, this was the video I was talking about where you very short can see the Org-Wide L7 rules; https://youtu.be/pFwMPxDjTQ4?si=I0ad6waIu5yUW9fO&t=1185

LinkedIn ::: https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/

Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution 🙂

All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.
Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.
Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco account. If you don't yet have a Cisco account, you can sign up.
Labels