Spoke-2-Spoke Communication!

khurram
Here to help

Spoke-2-Spoke Communication!

Greetings,

 

I want to establish that spoke-2-spoke communication in a VPN tunnel. I am using MX600 in my HO and i.e. HUB. on 2 locations using MX65w - Spoke & on 2 locations using cisco router. All 4 sites are connected with HO through VPN but spoke cannot communicate with other spoke. Kindly help me to fix this issue.

3 Replies 3
Network-dad
A model citizen

If you are trying to communicate from spoke to spoke why don't you just set all MX's as a hub (Mesh) VPN?... https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Site-to-site_VPN/Configuring_Hub-and-spoke_VPN_Connections_on_th...

Dakota Snow | Network-dad Linkdedin
CMNO | A+ | ECMS2
Check out The Bearded I.T. Dad onThe Bearded I.T. DadThe Bearded I.T. Dad
BrechtSchamp
Kind of a big deal

As @Nash already mentioned, we first need clarification if the OP is talking about AutoVPN or not. But let's assume he is.

 

@Network-dad it's not necessary to set them up as mesh to make the spokes communicate each other. By default the site-to-site VPN firewall allows communication between subnets that participate in AutoVPN. The packets will be routed over the hub in a hub-and-spoke configuration but it should work fine.

 

So @khurram , what is your site-to-site VPN firewall configuration? This is the default and should allow inter-spoke communication:

image.png

And have you included your spoke subnets into VPN? In other words, is the dropdown set to "VPN On"?

image.png

Nash
Kind of a big deal

Let me make sure I understand here:

You have an MX600 as your HUB.

 

Two sites are using MX65W.

 

Two sites are using Cisco routers.

 

Are you using AutoVPN between the MX65W and the MX600, or a regular third party tunnel?

 

Edit: If you're using AutoVPN with your Meraki devices, they won't be able to talk to your Cisco routers. Aaron Willette has a design for allowing AutoVPNed Meraki devices access to resources over other tunnels: https://www.willette.works/merging-meraki-vpns/

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.