Questions about VPN and NATs with 2x MX75 in HA pair

[mvalpreda]

I know how to set up the virtual IP address on the WAN side for 2x MX devices in HA - 1 public IP per device and another IP address for the virtual IP.

If I am using AnyConnect, where should the clients connect? The DNS name that comes up for the virtual IP address in the dashboard? 

Should there be [near] zero downtime with anything on the one-to-one or one-to-many NAT rules if there is a failover event?

[alemabrahao]

The address that must be considered is that of the VIP. As for the time of the failover event, it is transparent to the user, it should lose a maximum of 2 or 3 pings.

[PhilipDAth]

>The DNS name that comes up for the virtual IP address in the dashboard? 

Correct.  Otherwise the automatic certificate name won't match.

>Should there be [near] zero downtime with anything on the one-to-one or one-to-many NAT rules if there is a failover event?

No state is synced between the two MX.  When a failover happens, all connections are dropped and must be made again.  In the case of AnyConnect, users need to reconnect.

[alemabrahao]

@PhilipDAth  I've already done several failover tests and I didn't have any problems, it was practically transparent, at most 2 or 3 pings were lost.

[PhilipDAth]

Try a long-running TCP connection, like a download.  You'll see that it fails.

But I agree, it is not noticeable for most things.  Userw mostly use their web browser these days and expect to just click reload.

[mvalpreda]

Failover tests on the VPN? Or something else?

[alemabrahao]

Tests on local LAN and S2S VPN. Client VPN is necessary to reconnect as mentioned by @PhilipDAth .

[mvalpreda]

Thanks for that info.

One firewall rules for other one-to-one NATs, is that using a virtual MAC address between the two devices?

For instance, I have WAN for MX1, WAN for MX2, and then the VIP for that. I have other NAT rules for the rest of the /29 block - one of those being SIP.

Am I going to have a problem with upstream ARP cache? Or does it use a virtual MAC address like I read about?

[geektoyz]

Sorry for post to old chat.  Do the MX75 appliances support HA pair?  Seems we had a sales call last year sometime where we were told MX85 or higher was needed for HA pair.  I don't see info here:

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/MX_Overviews_and_Specifications/MX75_Datasheet

or here

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MX_Warm_Spare_-_High_Availability_Pair

[PhilipDAth]

They support HA.

[geektoyz]

Awesome!  thanks Phil.