MX SD wan and Maximum number of branch support?

Solved
Abhishek7310
Comes here often

MX SD wan and Maximum number of branch support?

I need to deploy MX devices in place of MPLS line to reduse the cost

 

there is one HO with 70 Systems and 30 branch (each 5 to 10 system)

 

I'm totally looking for SD wan solution in Meraki

 

Suggest me which device should i go for i shortlisted 4 devices and also wants to know whats the maximum HO  to branch conectivity for SD Wan?

 

For Small Branch

MX64

MX67

 
Medium Branch or HO
MX84
MX100

 

pl advice

 

1 Accepted Solution
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

This is the MX sizing guide:

https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_whitepaper_mx_sizing_guide.pdf 

 

The MX84 will be fine for your head office.

 

I tend to use either MX67 or MX68 for small sites.

The advantage of the MX68 is it has a 10 port LAN switch built-in (and two of those ports are PoE).  So if your site has fewer than 10 devices to plug in you don't need a separate switch.

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

This is the MX sizing guide:

https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_whitepaper_mx_sizing_guide.pdf 

 

The MX84 will be fine for your head office.

 

I tend to use either MX67 or MX68 for small sites.

The advantage of the MX68 is it has a 10 port LAN switch built-in (and two of those ports are PoE).  So if your site has fewer than 10 devices to plug in you don't need a separate switch.

DarrenOC
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Hi @Abhishek7310 , what connectivity do you have at your Head Office\Data Centre? I would consider the MX250 as there isn’t that much of a price jump from the MX100 to the MX250 especially if your Cisco Partner has deal registered this for you. Just my 2 cents

Darren OConnor | doconnor@resalire.co.uk
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/

I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.