- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
MX SD wan and Maximum number of branch support?
I need to deploy MX devices in place of MPLS line to reduse the cost
there is one HO with 70 Systems and 30 branch (each 5 to 10 system)
I'm totally looking for SD wan solution in Meraki
Suggest me which device should i go for i shortlisted 4 devices and also wants to know whats the maximum HO to branch conectivity for SD Wan?
For Small Branch
MX64
MX67
pl advice
Solved! Go to solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is the MX sizing guide:
https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_whitepaper_mx_sizing_guide.pdf
The MX84 will be fine for your head office.
I tend to use either MX67 or MX68 for small sites.
The advantage of the MX68 is it has a 10 port LAN switch built-in (and two of those ports are PoE). So if your site has fewer than 10 devices to plug in you don't need a separate switch.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is the MX sizing guide:
https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_whitepaper_mx_sizing_guide.pdf
The MX84 will be fine for your head office.
I tend to use either MX67 or MX68 for small sites.
The advantage of the MX68 is it has a 10 port LAN switch built-in (and two of those ports are PoE). So if your site has fewer than 10 devices to plug in you don't need a separate switch.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Abhishek7310 , what connectivity do you have at your Head Office\Data Centre? I would consider the MX250 as there isn’t that much of a price jump from the MX100 to the MX250 especially if your Cisco Partner has deal registered this for you. Just my 2 cents
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/
I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
