It slightly bugs me to be using 128 instead of 1. Is there an unseen advantage to using .128. there instead .1 for simplicity? The only thing I can think of is if Im working with two NICs it makes it easier to know what interface Im on if theres differentiation. Thoughts?
Its just a random subnet. As far as i know.
No need to keep it.
Changed it. Seems fine.
No need to keep 192.168.128.x. I would not use 192.168.1.0/24 or 192.168.0.0/24 if possible due to overlap. It’s commonly used by home networks and even some businesses. If you ever need to connect in via client VPN or have a third party tunnel, those two subnets can cause you a lot of grief.
Better to avoid or remediate if you can.
A quick search points to no.
Honestly, I’m (relatively) lazy and reboot things. Specifically, I tell my clients to reboot things. 😉 On most DHCP devices, that will force them to repeat the DORA process.
On the MX, you should be able to clear the lease table for a specific scope by temporarily disabling the dhcp server for the associated vlan. Disable dhcp server, save, wait a min. Re-enable, save, wait a min.
Then restart dhcp devices or otherwise force a renewal.
I rebooted lol
im nowhere near business critical
went with 192.168.3.0/24
less irritating than 128