Hi everyone! I am new to the community. Full disclosure; I don't believe I have ever registered to a blog/community board in my past. This approach will be a first for me.
I will keep my question very simple. I recently purchased the MX84 (router/security) and MS225 (switch) and am trying to identify which hardware should manage my VLAN's and DHCP. Looks like both are capable of handling the task.
Solved! Go to solution.
Welcome to the forums @Rod, as others have already mentioned the MX is your best option for setting up your VLANs and DHCP. My reasons for this are below but these are based on a small network if you are building a large L3 network I would suggest doing this on your core switch
1. You are less likely to reboot an MX unit than a switch which means DHCP leases aren't going to be affected.
2. If you add multiple switches you might not always have every VLAN going everywhere and having DHCP on a switch in this instance could get messy.
3. Its easy to remember, the switches to the switching and the MX does your DHCP, VLANS and routing.
As I said above though if your network is going to be a resonable sized network I would setup everything on a core switch.
Thanks, Nolan. If you don't mind me asking, why would you recommend the MX over the switch?
Welcome to the forums @Rod, as others have already mentioned the MX is your best option for setting up your VLANs and DHCP. My reasons for this are below but these are based on a small network if you are building a large L3 network I would suggest doing this on your core switch
1. You are less likely to reboot an MX unit than a switch which means DHCP leases aren't going to be affected.
2. If you add multiple switches you might not always have every VLAN going everywhere and having DHCP on a switch in this instance could get messy.
3. Its easy to remember, the switches to the switching and the MX does your DHCP, VLANS and routing.
As I said above though if your network is going to be a resonable sized network I would setup everything on a core switch.
I would choose to use the MX if the inter-vlan bandwidth requirements are low. If the intervlan-bandwidth requirements are high I would use the MS225.
@PhilipDAth's got the same logic my company uses. If there's not a lot of inter-VLAN talk, MX is fine. If there's a significant amount of traffic, L3 goes into the core switches.
Thanks, Nick...
You are correct. This will be my only physical switch. As for VLAN's, I have configured 4 thus far; 1st for our lab, 2nd for VoIP, 3rd for our office suite and the 4th for our Surveillance\DVR setup. I am planning on keeping all of my Meraki devices (router, switch & AP) on the default VLAN (1 - Lab) with static IP's assigned. Today's traffic is not so heavy, but the prediction is for volume to increase within months - hopefully : )
Thank you to everybody on this thread...your recommendations are steady. I took everyone’s advise and configured the MX to manage VLAN’s and DHCP. Very impressed with the support in this community. My network is not big by any means but I still have quite a bit of work ahead of me. I will definitely keep this community in mind for other potential roadblocks.