Has somebody already tried to convert to the new licensing model in an org that has MX‘s in a warm spare environment? I just did and Dashboard is yelling at me because I seem to have an unlicensed device: my primary MX from that warm spare (interestingly enough, because this one has always been licensed).
The documentation and FAQ still clearly state:
Do I need duplicate licenses to cover my security appliance in a warm spare configuration?
A: No, if two security appliances are in a warm spare/HA configuration licensing is only required for one of the two devices. The only additional cost of a warm spare configuration is the redundant hardware.
I guess / hope that this is just something that hasn‘t come up yet but something seems to be utterly wrong in this case.