Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About meraki-newbie
meraki-newbie
Getting noticed
Member since Apr 9, 2023
an hour ago
Community Record
56
Posts
6
Kudos
1
Solution
Badges
yesterday
2 Kudos
finally it's solved, there are several way we did another test again using a single AP : We activating profile 2,4GHZ and then upgrade the MR 57 to 30.7 firmware After the upgrade process done, we wait for a while (around 15 minutes) And then apply the basic indoor profile to allow 2,4 & 5GHz After that we monitor the connection stability for 1 hour And then we upgrade firmware another 31 MR57 AP Currently after more than 12 hours, all MR57 Connection performed well, without any flapping happened again Notes on the firmware 30.7 changelog mentioned the bug we have been facing for weeks cheers
... View more
yesterday
yes, we try to unmount 1 AP that have been upgraded to 30.7 with 2m direct cable to poe switch but the AP still rebooted
... View more
yesterday
we have already upgraded to 30.7, it still not solved.. the AP suddenly rebooted once 5GHz activate..
... View more
yesterday
2 Kudos
the flex radio set only available for 5GHz do you mean create basic indoor profile to only allow 5GHz? we have try upgrade to 31.1.1 but it didn't solved.. should we try the 30.7?
... View more
Monday
well noted, but something strange as i mentioned above, when we use default indoor profile with 5Ghz activated, the AP rebooted after 30 minutes, it's happened frequently..
... View more
Monday
We have already try to add another connection to the AP, another strange behaviour the MS125 48LP only draw the power 8-9W each ports
... View more
Monday
yep on the data sheet, MS125 48LP could have output power until 30W, is this common behaviour of the switch? due to there are no user connected to the AP right now
... View more
Monday
Dear all We have newly Meraki MR57 to be installed , these AP connect to MS125-48LP , but when we activate default profile with 2,4 & 5Ghz active all the APs Flap.. Then we create custom profile to activate only 2,4Ghz, all the AP running well and never flapping There are some note on our MS port mentioned Power Draw 15W(Requested 30W), could be this low power input will be the cause? notes : we run the AP with 30.6 firmware version thank you
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Installation
-
Other
Monday
It works the root bridge of MS125 is our Catalyst C3850 core.. we set up MSTP between C3850 .. Core 1 MSTP priority 4096 Core 2 MSTP priority 8192 All MS125 RSTP priority 61140 thanks all..
... View more
Saturday
for now we didn't use the VSS between CAT1-CAT2 (WSC3850)... should we set VSS the CAT1-CAT2 for better results?
... View more
Saturday
2 Kudos
Alright, so, with this topology below MX1-MX2 |. | CAT1-CAT2 \. / MS125 we should set MSTP between 2 CATALYST (CAT1 & CAT2) setup the CAT1 as root & CAT2 as secondary root.. meanwhile on the MS125, just config RSTP with highest number priority available, so the forwarding path will be CAT1-CAT2 MS125-CAT1 and the blocking path will be MS125-CAT2 is my understanding of the concept correct?
... View more
Saturday
did you just allow vlan 1 as native? or just allow vlan 1 on the vlan list with another native vlan?
... View more
Saturday
so for stability we need to configgure mstp on catalyst? yes we have already run native vlan 99 between ms <> catalyst trunk ports but the root port not appearing at Catalyst, as we expected
... View more
Saturday
well this is worked, connecting my laptop to LAN and set static IP 1.1.1.99 /24 and having gateway 1.1.1.100 thank you
... View more
Saturday
Access Point couldn't flow any data traffic, due to low PD from MS125.. we wondering how to tweak the inline power on MS125, could we do the inline power on MS125 like another cisco switch poe families?
... View more
Saturday
Dear All, We want to make catalyst switch(Core) below as an RSTP root primary and secondary for several MS switches under the Core : We have already state the all the MS switch RSTP priority to the maximum value of 61140 but, it seems the root switch still on each MS is there any approaches to move the RSTP root to the Catalyst Core Switch, below a brief config on catalyst glad to hear any response from you all
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Layer 2
Thursday
we have try this static configuration, but it doesn't work.. is there another setup we needed? or is there different management IP form MS125 ?
... View more
Thursday
i'm trying to access the MS125 from the Management port, it's worked when we connect the LAN to ISP devices to get DHCP, and access the MS125 from the dashboard.. but unfortunately, we wonder how to reach/config MS125 when there are no available connectivity to public Internet? the MS125 should be managed by management port itself, since the management port built in on the device
... View more
Thursday
on my condition now, the MS is still on staging step, to pre-check and pre-config before added to the dashboard...
... View more
Thursday
Dear all, We couldn't access MS125-48P with Localpage, we have try doing static IP address using this guide below : https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/MS_Installation_Guides/MS125_Series_Installation_Guide#Assigning_an_IP_Address But after all, we still couldn't get to access the MS125, it's confusing us, because we couldn't do anything to configure from localpage, like usual MS/MX series glad to hear your response
... View more
4 weeks ago
thank you victor for your response.. just another suggestion, after re-schedule performed, the newly date of firmware upgrade date could popped up and renew/refresh the old one. Due to the popped up notification could be seen once we access the dashboard and potentially be a misleading information.. cheers
... View more
4 weeks ago
Hello everyone, we get an suggestion to do firmware upgrade of our MR Appliances on May 23, 2024. as an popped up notification below : and then we try to reschedule it to May 20, 2024 as shown below : there are several question due to after reschedule the upgrade date, the blue popped up "Upcoming Scheduled Maintenance" still showing the scheduled upgrade will be on May 23, 2024 rather than on on May 20, 2024, even when we try to close the popped up blue notification. So this made us confusing, when the valid/exact date this upgrade will perform ? should it on May 20, 2024 because we have already reschedule it ? glad to hear from you all thanks
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Administrators
-
Firmware Upgrades
May 5 2024
6:04 AM
How about using VRRP between 2 MXs.. should the remote non-meraki configured WAN1 shared IP as their remote IP pointing to our MX ? and if we have WAN2 shared IP, should the tunnel configured to WAN2 shared IP as their remote IP as well ?
... View more
May 1 2024
11:15 PM
is that mean, traffic will flow through the MX-2 when heartbeat links fail between two MXs? and both MXs still having WAN connectivity established to the Cloud Meraki
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | yesterday |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 28 | |
| 2 | 185 | |
| 2 | 221 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
