Meraki

Community
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

About CPillar

Re: Non-Meraki site-to-site vpn peer and static route on MX

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Sep 27 2023 3:03 PM
‎Sep 27 2023 3:03 PM
Firewall rules at the DC   All is working now ... View more

Re: Non-Meraki site-to-site vpn peer and static route on MX

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Sep 26 2023 9:34 AM
‎Sep 26 2023 9:34 AM
K.  Just so I understand   Any meraki S2S peers do not need routes back from DC as our MX hub will route as needed via AutoVPN magicness (we have 14 MX68 spokes right now and never had to ask DC to route back)   Any non-meraki S2S peers do need routes back from DC as the MX hub will not route as needed because no AutoVPN magicness   Correct? ... View more

Re: Non-Meraki site-to-site vpn peer and static route on MX

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Sep 26 2023 7:35 AM
‎Sep 26 2023 7:35 AM
The mx and the udmse have each others subnets.  I'll confirm with the datacenter itself.    I was assuming that the datacenter didnt need a static route back to the subnet behind the udmse since none of the subnets behind our other meraki peers have static routes back from the datacenter.  is this the magic of autovpn? ... View more

Non-Meraki site-to-site vpn peer and static route on MX

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎Sep 26 2023 7:05 AM
‎Sep 26 2023 7:05 AM
Hello folks   We have a MX 250 with typical vlans and a static route to a 3rd party data center hosting our servers (VMs).   We have an Ubiquiti UDMSE successfully connected with a S2S to the MX 250 and clients behind the UDMSE can see clients on the vlans on the MX but they cannot see the servers in the data center via the static route.  All our other meraki peers can of course see the data center via autovpn.   Any suggestions?     ... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.