Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About MerakiLover
MerakiLover
Here to help
Member since May 11, 2018
Apr 27 2020
Community Record
15
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Jan 21 2019
7:46 AM
Thanks a lot! do you know if that that is possibile too via snmp ?
... View more
Jan 21 2019
6:54 AM
Hello guys, I've a question concerning this: how can I monitor / be alerted if a warm spare device fails? Is there something in the dashboard to setup for being warned about this? Is is possibile to do it via snmp either? I'm not talking about the primary mx fail so that there will be a failover but I'm talking about the secondary idle MX that fails. Thanks a lot
... View more
Sep 10 2018
2:34 AM
Thanks Philip.. you are right and it makes sense. The fact that traceroute does not show the real traffic path hop-by-hop does not mean that there is an hub or that is a full mesh. Thanks for your help
... View more
Sep 7 2018
12:26 AM
Hi all, I've customer with 300 sites with VendorX where he has a hub and spoke topology. He has MPLS for some traffic (see voip) where this traffic can reach every other site directly. We want to move this network to Meraki Sd-wan... So finally topology is hub&spoke with DSL + MPLS (over wan interfaces of course). Customer is worried about going to a scenario where traffic from a branch to another has to pass via the hub, always. Is there any workaround for this ? (of course we want to avoid the real hub-hub scenario, otherwise we would have tons of connections for each site). Thanks
... View more
Jul 19 2018
6:59 AM
ok, that's good. I understand I could route the internet reachability via a local L3 back to WAN1, but that's it not feasible in my case. I understand NAT is a matter of the ISP.. MX only see private ip. Are we sure that then MX would not create two tunnels via wan2 ? (one via mpls internet breakout and the other via private ip address?) I was thinking to filter out all the internet traffic and leave only the mgmt meraki traffic. Is that a good idea or useless? thanks
... View more
Jul 19 2018
5:14 AM
Good. Thanks. Now the question becomes: ( I add details to the previous scenario 😞 previous scenario: - customer with branches in different countries - branches have one local internet connectivity (wan1) + one local mpls (wan2) that it has an internet breakout via mpls details: since the branches have an internet breakout via MPLS I expect the MX to inform the registry that it has on WAN2 a private ip address and a public ip address. This is on MPLS. I expect the MX being able to form two tunnels on this WAN2: one via private ip address on MPLS and one via the local internet breakout (via mpls backbone) What would happen then? Would the MX prefer the tunnel on private ip addresses ?
... View more
Jul 19 2018
3:57 AM
my target is: having sd-wan and tunnels on both wans. What I don't understand is if Meraki mgmt traffic need to reach the Dashboard via both interfaces or not
... View more
Jul 19 2018
3:47 AM
Hi Spivey, sorry but I think I have a different scenario that I try to describe: - customer with branches in different countries - branches have one local internet connectivity (wan1) + one local mpls (wan2) that it has an internet breakout via mpls what I need: - general internet traffic via wan1 - business traffic via mpls via wan2 I guess the requirements is that I need both Meraki mgmt traffic able to reach internet via both wan. Is that correct ?
... View more
Jul 17 2018
8:14 AM
Hi! Question about this sentence: To form an AutoVPN over an MPLS network it is a requirement all the end points all go out the same end point and all be NATed to the same public IP address. What happens if the ip addresses are different? Let's say that the internet breakout is "local" and not centralized. Would the autovpn then get formed over the public internet addresses and so I lose the option to use the mpls backup for the AutoVPN?
... View more
Jul 16 2018
1:01 AM
yeah. .the problem is that I can't use regex so how can I fix URLs like these? *.clients[N].google.com:443/HTTPS
... View more
Jul 13 2018
1:47 AM
Hi, Can you confirm there is no way of recognize and so shape Google Drive? I can't see it in the traffic sharing options.. and since I cannot use the regex and create a custom signature it's pretty impossibile to filter it or shape it. Am I the only one with this problem? Any news on the road map of this?
... View more
Jul 13 2018
1:40 AM
Thanks guys!
... View more
Jul 12 2018
8:06 AM
hey, I've not asked for 30 months of single second peak. 6 months of 5 minutes average would be more than enough. Any workaround with 3rd part software? (snmp or api) ?
... View more
Jul 12 2018
7:32 AM
Hello guys. I've a question about the bandwidth statistics on MX. I would like to make a report about last 6 months of wan network usage. What I see is that if I zoom out the peaks and spikes are "aggregated" or are lowered down to a different speed. See attached image. Is that a bug or what? Another question.. is there a way to get the statistics not "aggregated" ? If I go back in the months and I look at the stats
... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
