Meraki

Elliot_Sandell · ‎Aug 22 2024

Just to come back to this: " Hello Elliot, finally got an answer for you. SmartNet is 100% needed as confirmed by the BU. If you were to convert a license that had DNA License for 3 years and SmartNet for 2 years, you would be credited with a 2 Year Meraki licenses So when converting from DNA -> Meraki, whatever you have the least off is the duration of the Meraki license (as you stated above). If that was to happen, we would strongly urge the customer to increase the lesser part of the DNA side to maximise the Meraki license."

Elliot_Sandell · ‎Jul 17 2024

Meraki C9300 conversion to meraki mode - apart from the obvious DNA conversion. Does the customer need a hardware coverage i.e. SNTC on the device as well? "To qualify for this promotion, all you need is an active DNA subscription and hardware service contract with Cisco" https://merakiresources.cisco.com/Cloud-Management-Customer-Request-Form.html

Elliot_Sandell · ‎Aug 24 2023

Hello, I know it's been touted for version 18.2 but a customer has noticed the vmx comparison sheet now displays the vmx large as available in Azure. I can't see it on any of our dashboards as an open beta - is this a closed beta and something support can grant access to? vMX Comparison Datasheet - Cisco Meraki Thanks

Elliot_Sandell · ‎Jun 21 2023

I am pretty sure you need to buy a Meraki Managment License. However, as its currently in test its not enforced and I think there will be a 30-day grace period post going to GA.

Elliot_Sandell · ‎Apr 24 2023

Just for anyone else - I had a customer who experienced exactly the same symptoms over the weekend. Logged with support who advised that we were hotting a couple of suspected bugs. Only rebooting the vMX a number of times brought it back. vMX was running 18.105, and 18.106 also looks to be effected. (No reported cases for 18.107 as of yet)

Elliot_Sandell · ‎Apr 27 2022

Hello currently prepping a design which has two hubs configured to handle DC-to-DC failover using BGP to prefer routes coming through the "primary" DC. We have a couple of vMXs that will be setup in Azure (Accross Regions) with backend routing to enable some resiliance if theres an issue with the peimary vMX. Now the customer wants the physical dcs to the the main hubs for connected offices and use the vMXs as bridges into azure. They want to roughly follow this - Deploying Highly Available vMX in Azure - Cisco Meraki Each Azure region has one unigue /16 and one shared /20 for prod vms - I'm trying to work out if I can set them up as Hubs (Priority 3 and 4) or just as spokes with some more specififc routes for the "primary" vMX. These vMXs will host a split tunnel AnyConnect VPN.

Meraki

Community

About Elliot_Sandell

Elliot_Sandell

Community Record

Badges

Re: Meraki C9300 License conversion

Meraki C9300 License conversion

v-MX Large in Azure - MX 18.2 Beta

Re: Cat 9300 cloud management migration

Re: Azure Meraki VMX virtual machine agent status not ready

Overlapping subnets on spokes/ or Hubs (Azure)

Re: Meraki C9300 License conversion

Re: Meraki C9300 License conversion

Re: Azure Meraki VMX virtual machine agent status not ready

Re: Cat 9300 cloud management migration