Meraki

Community
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

About jimmlegs

Re: New Layer 2 point to point LAN configuration

by in Switching
‎Jan 26 2022 3:01 PM
‎Jan 26 2022 3:01 PM
Currently waiting on a third party to confirm the remote end of the connection, I think they may only perform changes one day per week. I will update this again once there is progress.   Thank you all  ... View more

Re: New Layer 2 point to point LAN configuration

by in Switching
‎Jan 25 2022 7:04 AM
‎Jan 25 2022 7:04 AM
I'm confirming with the remote end RE: configuration. the 192.168.68.253 default route does go out through as ASA, perhaps they have more of a "router on a stick" configuration which I will hunt down as well. I was hoping the static routes would supersede the default but that does not appear to be the case.   Thank you ... View more

Re: New Layer 2 point to point LAN configuration

by in Switching
‎Jan 24 2022 4:23 PM
‎Jan 24 2022 4:23 PM
I believe I have setup the interfaces/routes properly but traffic is not being routed properly from my server network to the new routes. When I run a trace to the other end of the connection it goes out the default route and not the static one I want. tracert 172.30.254.1 Tracing route to 172.30.254.1 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms * <1 ms 192.168.68.252 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out.     Thank you ... View more

New Layer 2 point to point LAN configuration

by in Switching
‎Jan 24 2022 9:48 AM
2 Kudos
‎Jan 24 2022 9:48 AM
2 Kudos
We have provisioned a new layer 2 circuit between and our office and datacenter and would like to configure the routing properly. Would you be able to assist or point me to an article that goes through this specific configuration, I come from the world of Catalyst switches and the GUI doesn't make as much sense to me This is a skeleton breakdown: Transit subnet: 172.30.254.0/28 Local transit interface: 172.30.254.2 Local subnet: 192.168.68.0/24 Remote subnet: 196.168.150.0/24 Remote transit interface: 172.30.254.1 I believe I create an interface for transit with IP 172.30.254.2/28 I then create a static route to 196.168.150.0/24 via 172.30.254.1 The remote side would be configured with the 172.30.254.1/28 address and their routes for 192.168.68.0/24 would point to 172.30.254.2 Does the above process sound correct? Thank you very much in advance for the assistance ... View more
Labels:
My Top Kudoed Posts
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.