The Meraki Community
Register or Sign in
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • About Mike_P1
Mike_P1

Mike_P1

Here to help

Member since Jan 18, 2022

‎06-08-2022
Kudos from
User Count
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
4
View All
Kudos given to
User Count
KarstenI
Kind of a big deal KarstenI
1
GreenMan
Meraki Employee GreenMan
1
PaulMcG
PaulMcG
1
Bruce
Bruce
1
LearningIsFun
LearningIsFun
1
View All

Community Record

9
Posts
4
Kudos
0
Solutions

Badges

ECMS1
First 5 Posts
Lift-Off View All
Latest Contributions by Mike_P1
  • Topics Mike_P1 has Participated In
  • Latest Contributions by Mike_P1

Re: Z3 port numbering - dashboard vs. API

by Mike_P1 in Dashboard & Administration
‎04-28-2022 06:32 AM
2 Kudos
‎04-28-2022 06:32 AM
2 Kudos
This does appear to be the case, @PhilipDAth . Support personnel removed the WAN/Internet and it resulted in the same message, but referencing port 0 ("Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false"). Therefore, I believe this is the answer regarding API vs. dashboard, including event log entries:   API / event log port0 = physical / labeled port 1 API / event log port1 = physical / labeled port 2 API / event log port2 = physical / labeled port 3 API / event log port3 = physical / labeled port 4 API / event log port4 = physical / labeled port 5   Thanks! ... View more

Z3 port numbering - dashboard vs. API

by Mike_P1 in Dashboard & Administration
‎04-22-2022 06:18 AM
‎04-22-2022 06:18 AM
Greetings, Meraki Community! I recently started investigating some complaints at a remote site. In the event log, I see the following message:   Ethernet port carrier change    device: port1, carrier: false   ...which was suggested by a support engineer to be the Z3's uplink. If I go by the label on the physical device, port1 is indeed the uplink.    By this logic, port1 = WAN    However, if I do an API call to get the Z3's neighbors, I see that the interfaces are broken down by "wan" AND "port", making the API output's "port1" the physical / labeled Port 2, which is a PC:   {     "ports": {         "wan0": {             "lldp": {                 "sourcePort": "wan0",                 "systemName": "Mitel IP Phone",                 "managementAddress": "192.168.11.114",                 "portId": "xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx"             }         },         "port1": {             "lldp": {                 "sourcePort": "port1",                 "portId": "xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx"    <------ HP desktop             }         }     },   By this logic, port1 = PC   So, just to confirm, the Meraki event log is using the physical / labeled ports on its log entries, whereas the API would likely use the table with corresponding ports below?   API wan0 = physical / labeled port 1 API port1 = physical / labeled port 2 API port2 = physical / labeled port 3 API port3 = physical / labeled port 4 API port4 = physical / labeled port 5   Hopefully I explained this well enough. Thanks for your time! ... View more

Re: Add MR36 to Z3 for targeted wifi in a remote part of the building?

by Mike_P1 in Wireless LAN
‎04-07-2022 06:45 AM
‎04-07-2022 06:45 AM
Glad to hear it, Karsten! I sincerely appreciate the response!! ... View more

Add MR36 to Z3 for targeted wifi in a remote part of the building?

by Mike_P1 in Wireless LAN
‎04-06-2022 01:28 PM
‎04-06-2022 01:28 PM
Greetings, Meraki community!   So...   Initial design requirement: Z3, with wifi disabled, providing IPSec tunnel and ISE authentication for single-user access at remote sites. We've had this in place for quite some time now.   Fast forward to today: I'd like to see if the same Z3 (with wifi still disabled) would function correctly with an MR36 via PoE to another part of the building where wifi is required.     - The Z3 would still provide the IPSec tunnel and ISE authentication for its user    - On the MR36 would live two VLANs/subnets with Internet-only access   I'll likely still have to test this for management's sake, but could this design work? Thanks! ... View more

Re: How/where could I compare the Tx/Rx capabilities between wireless Merak...

by Mike_P1 in Wireless LAN
‎03-14-2022 12:05 PM
‎03-14-2022 12:05 PM
Yes! Good points, Paul. I didn't consider it, but there's a high degree of likelihood that two out of three of these devices would end up locked in a box. Kudos to you as well! ... View more

Re: How/where could I compare the Tx/Rx capabilities between wireless Merak...

by Mike_P1 in Wireless LAN
‎03-14-2022 11:57 AM
‎03-14-2022 11:57 AM
Fantastic summary, Bruce! I appreciate you taking the time to provide such a well-rounded answer. Kudos to you! ... View more

How/where could I compare the Tx/Rx capabilities between wireless Meraki de...

by Mike_P1 in Wireless LAN
‎03-13-2022 07:58 PM
‎03-13-2022 07:58 PM
Greetings, Meraki community! As the subject suggests, I'd like to compare a few different products' wireless capabilities. The MR36, for instance, has a Tx/Rx table here https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/MR_Overview_and_Specifications/MR36_Datasheet, but I can't find comparable pages for MX*W or Z3 devices.    At a high level (price not a consideration at the moment), the design might look something like this, for a small to medium office:   MX68W (MX w/ wireless) MX68 + MR36 Z3   Best guess right now is MX + MR > MX*W > Z3, but I simply don't have the documentation to back that up. Is this outlined somewhere that I might be overlooking? Alternatively, is there a better way to look at this? Thanks, all! ... View more

Re: MG IMEIs from API?

by Mike_P1 in Developers & APIs
‎03-04-2022 06:07 AM
2 Kudos
‎03-04-2022 06:07 AM
2 Kudos
That'll do it. I sincerely appreciate the response! Cheers! ... View more

MG IMEIs from API?

by Mike_P1 in Developers & APIs
‎03-04-2022 05:28 AM
‎03-04-2022 05:28 AM
Greetings, all. I've been looking for an "easy button" to pull IMEIs from, what is soon to be, several thousand MGs on a somewhat continual basis. I can't find an API call that'll do it, and drilling down to "cellular gateway" through the portal to retrieve this information for each network is predictably unsustainable. Is there a better way to do this? Or perhaps a GET that I've overlooked? Thanks! ... View more
Kudos from
User Count
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
4
View All
Kudos given to
User Count
KarstenI
Kind of a big deal KarstenI
1
GreenMan
Meraki Employee GreenMan
1
PaulMcG
PaulMcG
1
Bruce
Bruce
1
LearningIsFun
LearningIsFun
1
View All
My Top Kudoed Posts
Subject Kudos Views

Re: Z3 port numbering - dashboard vs. API

Dashboard & Administration
2 397

Re: MG IMEIs from API?

Developers & APIs
2 590
View All
Powered by Khoros
custom.footer.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Cisco Privacy
  • Khoros Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 Meraki