Ok. And as for the second part of the question? Does co-channel interference affect the RSSI value received by the client from an AP? For example, AP has 5 clients associated with it, would RSSI of the AP received by the clients be of the same value with 5 clients as it would with 1 client? ... View more

@cmr    Thank you for the proposition! If I understood it correctly, it would look something like this:   I like it since if I had designed the solution from scratch, it would have probably done something similar. We were however given the equipment and told to do the best with what we have, so, as you can imagine I'm trying to come up with something that involves the existing hardware before we ask for some additional. 🙂   So I guess my question would be if this could be achievable with something like this:   MX100s would still be terminating the VPN tunnels to branch locations on the L2 network while MX250s would, I guess, perform some kind of policy-based routing in a way that everything meant for branch communication would go on the WAN2 interface while all other traffic would go to WAN1.   Do you think this is a viable solution at all? Will we run into some VRRP, STP, or simply general connectivity problems with this topology?   Best regards ... View more

There's only one L2 network, everything goes over the same provider, however yes, the requirement is to encrypt the traffic that goes from the branches to center.   As I've mentioned, we're open to suggestions, primarily if this can be achieved in any way with just these 4 MXs... ... View more

Hi,   Just the L2 WAN. The idea is that every branch should go to Internet through those MX250s.   Best regards ... View more