Community Record
4
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Feb 16 2024
11:05 PM
@ofelipe So we we found one problem, we had to unstack the core switches to have multicast work fine with igmp snooping enabled. Maybe even brake lagg also (but no more abolutely sûre about this point).
... View more
Oct 28 2021
1:06 PM
Hello, We are implementing a network for AV applications, like Dante audio over IP, NDI and lighting control. Last year, we implemented the core part and 3 access switches and this year we added quite a bunch of access switches. Before this year's extension, we had IGMP snooping enabled on the whole network and things worked fine - all multicast traffic was flowing as expected. The following multicast groups are used for all devices to work properly: Group address Port Usage 239.255.0.0/16 4321 ATP Multicast Audio 239.69.0.0/16 5004 AES67 Multicast Audio (RTP / AVP port) 223.0.0.233 8700-8706 Dante Control 224.0.1.129-132 319, 320 PTP 224.0.0.251 5353 mDNS 224.0.0.230 – 233 8700 – 8708 Multicast Control and Monitoring 239.16x.x.x ACN Yamaha 239.192.x.x-239.195.x.x SDT session, dyn. Based on IP and MAC Shure 239.254.1.1 9998 Logging 239.254.3.3 9998 PTP Logging (if enabled) 239.254.44.44 9998 Logging 239.255.254.253 8427 Multicast SLP Shure/Yamaha 239.255.255.250 1900 SSDP, service discovery Shure 239.255.255.253 SLP multicast address Shure 239.255.255.255 9875 SAP (AES67 discovery) After adding the access switches this year, we have a problems with multicast traffic reaching them from other switches. Only on the NEW switches. They are all connected over a trunk LAGG to the core switches with the same admin VLAN and allow all VLANs. So we had to limit IGMP snooping to the core switches to re-gain normal functionality. This is a problem for access points and 100Mbps devices, we can't leave the network in this situation. Does someone know what can be a problem for multicast traffic on Meraki switches? All switches are MS425-32, MS125-24/48. And how on earth this problem happens only on new switches?? Is there a hardware change? Thanks, Daniel
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Layer 2