Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Bjron
Bjron
Comes here often
Member since Oct 2, 2021
May 26 2023
Community Record
4
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Dec 8 2021
6:24 AM
We are working / trying to get authentication of users via Google domains, our target is "no one should be allowed to internet /intranet until gets authenticated using email&password (domains hosted on Google)" but we are facing issues. I tried to engage third-party HSNM for this issue, but facing same issues. Working with HSNM product for Splash page, HSMN support asked us to check if SSL certificates can be imported on Meraki controller in the same way they do with other onsite controller, like aruba, cisco wlc, UBNT unifi, tp-link etc....but in our case Merak controller is cloud based 😞
... View more
Nov 24 2021
7:55 AM
We are trying to integrate Meraki MX with radius server, Can we upload upload your SSL Cert + Intermediate ? Please suggest.
... View more
Nov 24 2021
7:54 AM
We are trying to integrate Meraki MX with radius server, Can we upload upload your SSL Cert + Intermediate ? Please suggest.
... View more
Oct 2 2021
11:34 AM
Hi Experts, I am new to Meraki, and confused about selection of Models of our multiple branches. We are planning to select SEC licenses with proper firewall/security feature implementations. We have approx. two types branches, Type1: Users approx. 500 or Less with Internet BW between 50Mbps to ~150Mbps Type2: Users approx. 500 to 1000 with Internet BW between 100Mbps to ~250Mbps Local partner suggest that for Type1 users, Meraki MX68 or by Maximum MX75 is sufficient for handling the load of ~500 users, because allocated internet bandwidth is on lower side here w.r.t MX68/MX75. And there will be not performance impact. But the official document says, MX95 is right choice for 500 users. Type2 user, Meraki MX95 or by maximum MX105 is sufficient for handling the load of ~1000 users, because allocated internet bandwidth is on lower side here w.r.t MX95/MX105. And there will be no performance impact. But the official document says, that MX250 should be right choice for 2000 user... Question: For performance benchmarking, Meraki appliance take care of total number of active users? or internet bandwidth terminated on MX-Appliance? If internet bandwidths are on lower side, MX-Appliance can handle the load of higher users than its capacity mentioned in sizing guide? Regards, Bjron
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
ACLs
-
Auto VPN
-
Client VPN
-
Other
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
