Meraki

ww · ‎Oct 1 2021

If the route is also learned and advertised at the hub2 then yes.

Bruce · ‎Sep 30 2021

You may want to try your luck and see if you can get your license converted to a VMX-M license, as per this document, https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Licensing/Meraki_Licensing, under the 'License Conversions' section.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Sep 29 2021

i would work from the guidance in the doc and that only allows a single model jump 80>84 or 84>85.

rhbirkelund · ‎Sep 28 2021

You can take a look at this White Paper from 2020, regarding AutoVPN formation.

Lohith · ‎Sep 16 2021

The VPN status is showing as up and the log details are as follows: Sep 16 10:06:00 Non-Meraki / Client VPN negotiation msg: initiate new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.86.175[4500]<=>52.149.169.190[4500] Sep 16 10:05:59 Non-Meraki / Client VPN negotiation msg: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 52.149.169.190[500]->192.168.86.175[500] spi=259264940(0xf7411ac) Sep 16 10:05:29 Non-Meraki / Client VPN negotiation msg: initiate new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.86.175[4500]<=>52.149.169.190[4500] Sep 16 10:05:27 Non-Meraki / Client VPN negotiation msg: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 52.149.169.190[500]->192.168.86.175[500] spi=256888059(0xf4fccfb) Does that mean NAT traversal is not enabled on the Azure VPN. Thanks, Lohith.

Meraki

Community

About Lohith

Lohith

Community Record

Badges

Re: Route priority of IPSEC tunnels with same local networks

Re: Migrate vMX100 from one Azure subscription to other.

Re: We need to replace an MX80 with MX85, can we transfer license, or do we...

Re: Is AutoVPN formed between Meraki peers based on IPSEC protocol?

Site to Site VPN from Meraki Z1 to Azure is showing up, but could not reach...