Meraki

bbc · ‎Feb 2 2021

@PhilipDAth Thank you for the feedback. I was playing around packet tracer with just Cisco switches after my initial post and did try out the single transit VLAN between the core(MX) and aggregation switches (MS425s). I haven't tried out the OSPF, as I ended up trying out a static route on both MS425s, but definitely like the idea of running OSPF instead. What would be my next step towards ensuring everything gets internet access on the MX side?

bbc · ‎Feb 1 2021

As long as you have internet connectivity, you will be fine without the MX. You can still manage your APs in the Meraki dashboard. Just ensure your uplink between the MS switch and new firewall is configured properly, primarily on the Firewall side since the MS is already in place.

bbc · ‎Feb 1 2021

what is the best way to approach the design below: 2 separate building network, each utilizing MS-425 distribution switch stack, but both connect to the same MX warm spare. Current design. Each distribution switch is serving dhcp. Goal is to have both networks talking to one another via the MX serving which is kind of as the core. I have a static route on from each distribution switch (Separate VLAN)to the MX. then static routes for each subnet from MX to the respective building. What is the best approach to get building 1 to talk to building 2, and vice versa?

Meraki

Community

About bbc

bbc

Community Record

Badges

Re: Meraki multi building deployment

Re: Meraki AP with other Firewall - fortigate, unifi etc.

Meraki multi building deployment

Re: Meraki AP with other Firewall - fortigate, unifi etc.