@cmr    I think there are several Meraki Customer Councils at Cisco in which they collate feature requests and roadmap them. If your dedicated to Meraki then your Rep should be able to get you an invite.    Until they have an affordable 1Gb Small Branch Router we will have look else where.  ... View more

@jdsilva changed to reflect Cisco's marketing - "small branch" ... View more

I do apologize @jdsilva I will go back and edit that.  ... View more

@DarrenOC I am appreciative of the feedback and the help in getting a resolution to the issue. There is no implied frustration on our part, we have discovered that small branch MX products are not fit for purpose for clients with 1Gb Wan circuits.    Thats been helpful to our work.  ... View more

@jdsilva    Our clients are in a FTTH rich area and 1GB circuit cost in on par with lower speed cable offering, so 1Gb services, it make good sense for our clients.    Cisco need a small Branch access router that can keep up with ISP service capabilities not the other way around.    The my statement remains appropriate,  small branch MX products are not fit for purpose for clients with 1Gb WAN circuits.      ... View more

Not withstanding the excellent humor, I am getting the sense from the feedback that the midrange MX products are not fit for purpose for clients with 1Gb Wan circuits.  ... View more

Is there a way to fully disable the FW? ... View more

I am not sure I follow,    All the ports on the on the MX are 1GB  ... View more

Then why have a 1Gb Internet port? ... View more

I thought that was only for the FW (and less for the VPN). It that the highest thought put possible for the MX65W? ... View more

Do you also know how to see the total amount of data that has passed through the switch internet trunk port over a designated timeframe   thanks ... View more

Thanks, that worked ... View more

no   the map is an entirely different location to where the APs and clients are actually located.    APs and clients are showing, map location is wrong  ... View more