@PhilipDAth I've noticed the same interop wise. Ironically almost every client that worked with WPA2-WPA3 personal transition mode also just works with WPA3. The handful of WPA2-only clients I had struggled to deal with a transitionary network.   I'm getting pretty tempted to segregate SSIDs to give me a WPA3 dedicated SSID. Even with PSKs, WPA3's fast transitions help a lot with video streaming when jumping between APs. WPA2 + 802.11r was great at that too but now with KRACK I'm still afraid to use that combo with PSK. ... View more

Yeah the key for second-hand Meraki ownership is that the original owner needs to cooperate in unclaiming the devices from their dashboard. It’s similar to how iPhones are activation locked to their original owner too. In general I’ve found that if you’re unable to establish that because the original business went under or original owners are MIA, you’re on your own.   It’s worth mentioning that the hardware warranty is forever tied to the first owner, and if you try to process an RMA, that’s the only address Meraki will be willing to ship to. Other than that, as a home office user with a limited budget, I’ve had generally good luck with saving a lot of money through second-hand, unclaimed Meraki hardware. ... View more

It’s worth remembering that 4x4 is important for beamforming too.... Beamforming requires using a pair of spatial streams to transmit the same signal with a phase offset. A 2x2 AP can only beamform in 1x1:1 mode, and considering most WiFi 6 clients are 2ss, IMO the 4x4 AP is the sweet spot. ... View more

the 45/55 used the “Hawkeye V1” chip from Qualcomm, also known as IPQ8078/8074.  These were followed by the second version of these chips, which were rebranded as Qualcomm Networking Pro. The official advertised difference is mainly that the second version does UL-OFDMA and UL-MU-MIMO.  With that said, other vendors have struggled with enabling many WiFi 5 features: 160MHz, DL-MU-MIMO, AP to client transmit beamforming (the receive direction works), and more. That leads me to suspect there might be more that is immature or problematic about these chips and it’s not just a matter of only supporting DL-OFDMA.  ... View more

I remember someone telling me that Tesla establishes a VPN tunnel using some 192.168.X.0/24 subnet and if your LAN is using the same subnet it will screw with the routing.   It might be worth a different addressing scheme. I literally just today connecting a Model 3 to a new home with a MX68+MR46/MR56, bridged VLAN, no issues. ... View more

yeah slightly breaking 450 is what I’m seeing as well. I suspect the uplink stats may be inaccurate. ... View more

That’s news to me, I’ve only seen 450-500mbit through my MX68 on a gigabit link, tested just last week. ... View more

27.4 is now a stable release candidate! Well deserved IMO, the 27.3 and 27.4 releases have both been rock solid. Really a no brainer for WiFi 6 APs but even on my MR53 the performance has been more consistent.  ... View more

I’ve seen this discussed on Reddit as well, the theory being they are faulty. It seems like tapping/pushing/prying on the mount can make the whine appear or go away, and when it whines it’s in repeater mode. ... View more

Chipset and radio improvements go a long way in the real world! That MR42/MR52/MR53 generation of Wave 2 APs is honestly the tipping point that got me to leave my previous preferred wifi vendor. ... View more

I don’t want to get into it here but my Ubiquiti Dream Machine is more of a Nightmare Machine. I highly recommend doing some homework on reviews as it looks amazing on paper but it is so buggy.  if you’re looking for alternatives for the smaller MXes I honestly would suggest looking at pfsense or opnsense on a small firewall appliance (you can find many popular ones online).   But having been around the block a few times I am here because I want to use an affordable priced MX. It is just so elegant. But this appliance sizing is barely scaling with medium tier consumer internet in 2020.  ... View more

If Meraki is listening, this is definitely a problem for even home office owners.   These days we can find symmetric gigabit residential service for $50-60 a month, sometimes less. I think there’s two takeaway points here: The MX64 and 67 SoCs are actually significantly more powerful members of the same SoC families that power consumer routers, and many of those are more than capable of performing NAT and L3 routing at line speed. It would be great to have a mode that provides at least gigabit throughput NAT even if it’s not possible to do traffic shaping, DPI, IPS, and so on. For some of us pro home users, quite honestly I am okay stomaching the hardware cost for a MX250. But a MX250 3 year AdvSec license is an eye watering $16,000. That ongoing cost is a severe dealbreaker especially since from a Meraki standpoint, I bet a 5 person home office with a MX250 vs a 5 person home office with a MX64 is similar in cost. The cost of the MX250 license seems to bake in an assumption that it’s being used in a massive site with more users and inherently more support overhead.   I love love love everything else about the MX series, but as my sites start having gigabit available, users demand being able to download at gigabit speeds. ... View more

It’s worth mentioning that Meraki generally includes an explicit warning in the release notes when a beta is particularly unpolished. Usually it says something like it’s an “early beta” and advises using different firmware. You can see such a warning on the earlier 15.x releases.   I honestly run most of my Meraki networks on Beta or Stable RC firmware and in a lot of ways I’ve found it to be improved compared to the latest stable release. ... View more

This is surely an iOS bug. I don't think WPA TKIP / WPA2 / WPA3 is even a legal transition mode. I don't see any sign that 27.3 is broadcasting a network like that -- might be worth packet capturing a few beacons. ... View more

About 1/3 of my clients are AX — iPhones, 2020 iPad Pros, and Intel Ax200/201s.  ... View more

Endpoint AV and gateway security are complementary technologies, they are two layers of defense, not meant to substitute for each other.   As an example:   You need an endpoint AV because it’s easy to hide traffic from a network gateway. For example, if a virus uses a password protected ZIP file (or encryption) to download its payload, or even HTTPS , a gateway cannot detect that threat, but an endpoint AV can easily see the infected file as it’s being unpacked.   And an endpoint AV is potentially weak because a virus running on the endpoint can attempt to disable the endpoint AV, but because such a virus does not compromise your MX, it cannot disable protection on the MX. ... View more

That seems like a different problem. The bug I was seeing was that these devices would totally stop passing traffic, not just slow/intermittent performance. ... View more

Did 27.3 fix it for you? I was surprised because the release notes made it sound like a small set of legacy devices but I saw it across 3 of the latest generation Macbook Pros, the behavior went away after the 27.3 update. ... View more

Interoperability issues with some older clients and/or drivers resulted in the clients getting into states where they could not pass any traffic (802.11ac Wave 2 MRs) Wow I thought I was going crazy. Ever since 27.2, all sorts of Apple devices have been doing this while connected to my MR42 but not my MR56.   Overall though the 27.x series seems golden if you have WiFi 6 APs. The MR56 easily got 20-25% faster aggregate throughput with my devices compared to 26.x, which is making them perform more comparably to consumer high end mesh routers like the 8x8 Orbi.   (I know in an enterprise world we might laugh at those devices, but those expensive consumer products seem to perform extremely well) ... View more