The Meraki Community
Register or Sign in
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • About TerryMundy
TerryMundy

TerryMundy

Conversationalist

Member since Dec 8, 2017

‎03-17-2019
Kudos given to
User Count
MeredithW
Community Manager MeredithW
1
MRCUR
MRCUR
1
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal PhilipDAth
1
View All

Community Record

3
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions

Badges

1st Birthday
Lift-Off View All
Latest Contributions by TerryMundy
  • Topics TerryMundy has Participated In
  • Latest Contributions by TerryMundy

Re: Multiple subnets through single port

by TerryMundy in Security / SD-WAN
‎12-11-2017 08:36 AM
‎12-11-2017 08:36 AM
Thanks to all that took time to reply. ... View more

Re: Multiple subnets through single port

by TerryMundy in Security / SD-WAN
‎12-08-2017 09:01 AM
‎12-08-2017 09:01 AM
Below is the technician's notes:   In short the MX can not do internal 1:1 Natting When traffic leaves the interface from the 172 network it is sent to the 20 network in the full 172 network space ip. The Watchguard when traffic traverses to the other network interface allows it to appear as if it's coming from the 20 network IP of the watchguard (Similar to a router). ... View more

Multiple subnets through single port

by TerryMundy in Security / SD-WAN
‎12-08-2017 08:46 AM
‎12-08-2017 08:46 AM
We're testing a Meraki MX84 before we purchase.  3 days were spent setting up VLANS using configuration from the old Watchguard.   Finally, ready for cutover and everything worked EXCEPT-our internal web servers had no return path.  The internal web server has 2 NICs.  One goes to the Internet and has an IP address of 10.10.x.x and the other NIC's IP address is 20.10.10.x.  The 20.10.x.x is NAT'd to our internal network.  This allows the web team to perform updates without going out to the Internet then establish a tunnel back in.   The MX84 has 2 Internet gateways and 2 BOVPNs.  The 5th port is connected to a core switch.   We were able to verify traffic passed internally from the core switch to the MX84 the on to the internal web server.  However, traffic could not return through the same route.  It defaulted to the 10.10.x.x network instead of 20.10.x.x.   The Meraki engineer claimed that the MX84 wasn't capable of handling the problem as this time and it's a future feature.   Can anyone help? ... View more
Kudos given to
User Count
MeredithW
Community Manager MeredithW
1
MRCUR
MRCUR
1
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal PhilipDAth
1
View All
Powered by Khoros
custom.footer.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Cisco Privacy
  • Khoros Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 Meraki