Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About IotaNetworks
IotaNetworks
Here to help
Member since Jan 16, 2020
Feb 18 2020
Community Record
8
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Feb 18 2020
5:34 PM
I have deployed MX250 as hub and is advertising about 30 subnets over VPN, when i added a new branch MX64, we see that routes for around 6 subnets are not getting active at all even after 12 hours of establishing VPN connectivity ? Any hints to debug further and what could be the probable cause ?
... View more
Jan 23 2020
2:57 AM
@cmr, I have selected an option which says"pass through or concentrator mode" not sure how to speicify it as concentrator mode ?
... View more
Jan 23 2020
12:03 AM
Yes, all vlans are set to VPN on. Yes, default route option is selected for this particular hub.
... View more
Jan 22 2020
11:29 PM
I am looking to uderstand the traffic flow behaviour when MX250 at hub location is set to passthrough mode, below is my scenarios c Branch-client1---MX64(spoke)---------internet----- FW at hub-----MX250(hub) FWat hub -----DC router ---DC-server1 Now Spoke has default route to MX250 hub and hub MX is set to passthrough mode and has Auto-VPN tunnel to spoke, Now since all the document claim that in passthrough mode all the traffic is just L2 bridged, want to understand if the traffic from Branch-client1 is sent to dest as DC-server1, i assume the flow would be 1. Branchclient-1 to MX64 to MX250 2. Now does MX250 send all traffic to FW which is the Default gateway of WAN interface for MX250 ? or does it only try to send it over Lan ports ?? please note i have no connection of lan port to DC-router
... View more
Jan 22 2020
11:23 PM
I have MX64 deployed as Spoke to an hub site with default route set to hub MX250, on the wan interface also i have Default route with next hop as the default gateway of the WAN interface. Is there a way to ensure there is only one Default route on MX64 ? Also customer complains that the LAn users on this branch node uses the default route over WAN interface to reach internet instead of going over to MX250 on the hub ? Have any one seen this issue ?
... View more
Jan 19 2020
4:42 AM
I am trying to deploy MX250 as hub to support warm spare mode the question is on M250-1 i have 192.168.13.10 on wan1 interface with 192.168.13.11 as virtual ip on M250-2 the physical address on wan1 interface should be 192.168.13.10 or 192.168.13.12 with virtual ip being 192.168.13.11 ??
... View more
Jan 18 2020
9:15 PM
Hub1-------Hub2 ------Spoke Spoke is configured with Hub2 being the default route, However i see all the routes from Hub1 on the Spoke pointing with next hop as Hub2, Is it possible to see only the auto-vpn routes from Hub2 and a default route ponting with nexthop as hub2 on the spoke ? Similarly can i apply policy to install only selected routes from Hub1 on Hub2 ?
... View more
Jan 16 2020
9:33 AM
I am trying to create a site-to-site VPN on MX250 as Hub and i see there is only one default subnet 192.168.24.0/24 available and i set the vpn participation off for this default subnet. When i try to save the changes i see an error message asking me to confirm that "there is an overlapping subnet 192.168.0.0/12 " across other networks within my organisation. While it is true that we do have this subnet on other site, i am unable to 1. Modify this default subnet 2. Delete this default subnet 3. with vpn participation set as off, this subnet should not be advertised to other sites hence overlap should not be a problem, but i am worried if i have to continue saving the config even with this error as it might cause routin issue on other sites. Please suggest if anyone has dealt with this kind of issue earlier ?
... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
