About NCITPro

NCITPro · ‎07-08-2019

Thanks Philip. I have not had a chance to try it yet but in looking at how I would do it, I expected to need to be able to configure it on an interface somehow. I even stopped by the Meraki zone at CLUS the other week and asked. I was told to assign it to an interface, even if that interface was not in use but I cannot use those IPs in NAT if I did it on a non-WAN interface. I will certainly give this a shot when the addresses get assigned this week.

NCITPro · ‎07-08-2019

Thanks. I have not had a chance to try it yet but in looking at how I would do it, I expected to need to be able to configure it on an interface somehow. I even stopped by the Meraki zone at CLUS the other week and asked. I was told to assign it to an interface, even if that interface was not in use but I cannot use those IPs in NAT if I did it on a non-WAN interface. I will certainly give this a shot when the addresses get assigned this week.

NCITPro · ‎07-03-2019

Does anyone else have a need for secondary IP addresses on interfaces on MX devices? I have seen customers that are trying to leverage MX to replace SMB firewall products and they need support for an additional /29 on the WAN interface to allow for additional 1:1 NAT configurations. I feel like this is a shortfall but curious if others see it the same way. Also helps with migrations/re-ip addressing of subnets on internal interfaces at times. [Mod comment: changing thread title to reflect thread contents!]

NCITPro

Community Record

Badges

Re: Secondary IP addresses on interfaces on MX devices?

Re: Secondary IP addresses on interfaces on MX devices?

Secondary IP addresses on interfaces on MX devices?

Secondary IP addresses on interfaces on MX devices?

Re: Secondary IP addresses on interfaces on MX devices?