cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • About rafiejo

Re: Non-Meraki VPN & AutoVPN using different WAN

by in Security / SD-WAN
‎06-20-2019 07:52 PM
‎06-20-2019 07:52 PM
Understood.   It's a bit confusing since we are going to have non-meraki vpn and AutoVPN.  As far as I know, non-meraki VPN will only work on WAN1 primary uplink. And we planned to have: WAN 1 : non-meraki VPN WAN 2 : AutoVPN   This rule only apply to AutoVPN right? But there is no option to prefer secondary uplink.   I guess we just need to create the rule here? ... View more

Re: Non-Meraki VPN & AutoVPN using different WAN

by in Security / SD-WAN
‎06-19-2019 11:52 PM
‎06-19-2019 11:52 PM
Thanks for the reply.    The 50 users, means 50 devices right? 30 CCTVs, 3 Servers, 4 workstation, 2 switches will be counted as 39 users? ... View more

Non-Meraki VPN & AutoVPN using different WAN

by in Security / SD-WAN
‎06-19-2019 10:05 PM
‎06-19-2019 10:05 PM
Hi,    I'm new here. Need some advice on the site-to-site VPN.   My organization is using MX84 as our firewall and we have 2 WAN.    Currently, we are using WAN 1 (Metro-E with fixed IP) to establish site-to-site VPN to 2 remote sites (both using Cisco ASA).    We are adding a new remote site, and I'm planning to have the new site to use MX64 to leverage on the AutoVPN features. As the new site going to use a lot of traffic (CCTV), I want to use WAN 2(High speed broadband) for this tunnel.    Is this going to work? Just want to make sure before proceed with the purchase.   *Only HQ need to be able to see remote sites. The remote sites doesn't need to see each other. ... View more
© 2023 Meraki