Meraki

rafiejo · ‎Jun 20 2019

Understood. It's a bit confusing since we are going to have non-meraki vpn and AutoVPN. As far as I know, non-meraki VPN will only work on WAN1 primary uplink. And we planned to have: WAN 1 : non-meraki VPN WAN 2 : AutoVPN This rule only apply to AutoVPN right? But there is no option to prefer secondary uplink. I guess we just need to create the rule here?

rafiejo · ‎Jun 19 2019

Thanks for the reply. The 50 users, means 50 devices right? 30 CCTVs, 3 Servers, 4 workstation, 2 switches will be counted as 39 users?

rafiejo · ‎Jun 19 2019

Hi, I'm new here. Need some advice on the site-to-site VPN. My organization is using MX84 as our firewall and we have 2 WAN. Currently, we are using WAN 1 (Metro-E with fixed IP) to establish site-to-site VPN to 2 remote sites (both using Cisco ASA). We are adding a new remote site, and I'm planning to have the new site to use MX64 to leverage on the AutoVPN features. As the new site going to use a lot of traffic (CCTV), I want to use WAN 2(High speed broadband) for this tunnel. Is this going to work? Just want to make sure before proceed with the purchase. *Only HQ need to be able to see remote sites. The remote sites doesn't need to see each other.

Meraki

Community

About rafiejo

rafiejo

Community Record

Badges

Re: Non-Meraki VPN & AutoVPN using different WAN

Re: Non-Meraki VPN & AutoVPN using different WAN

Non-Meraki VPN & AutoVPN using different WAN