- About RYN0
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
RYN0
Here to help
Member since Oct 20, 2017
Wednesday
Community Record
16
Posts
8
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
07-24-2019
12:37 PM
Hi CptnCrnch I am asking if anyone here is familiar with making a Fortigate work with a Meraki MX to get a stable VPN tunnel going and how they did it. If I need snide remarks in the future, I will be sure to go to you first. If you cannot contribute, there is not point in replying to this thread and wasting other people's time with your useless comments. Have a nice day!
... View more
07-24-2019
11:04 AM
I know how to set it up on the MX end. I just cannot get just right on the fortinet end. I setup a custom IPSec VPN policy on the fortigate with matching phase 1 and 2 proposals. not sure what else is needed on the fortigate end to make it play nice.
... View more
07-23-2019
10:03 PM
Is there anyone with experience setting up site to site VPN links between an MX and a Fortigate? I am familiar with and have used the guidelines in Meraki's KB dealing with 3rd party VPNs. I am having no luck at all still. Any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks.
... View more
07-15-2019
01:34 PM
Now that you mention it, I could imagine it being the version of TLS on the server (2008r2 DC) may be too old for the MX67 with the latest stable firmware on it. My own resolution for the time being was to setup NPS on the DC and enable RADIUS authentication in the MX client VPN settings, and this works just fine for them.
... View more
07-15-2019
12:10 PM
Hi all, We recently replaced and MX60 with an MX67 for a client or ours. Ever since then the client VPN will no longer authenticate via AD authentication. I can flip it to Meraki authentication and it works fine though. I re-verified my client VPN settings are correct. I even check the DC certificate in case it was some sort of TLS issue, but the certificate is fine. I setup the DC on the Active Directory Authentication page to see if that would produce an error but it connects fine with the green checkmark status. The issue was even escalated to the meraki development team to look into. They states they are able to see is that the AD server is attempting to create a TLS session with the Meraki device in a way which is not compatible, however, we are unable to do further troubleshooting from their end. Next troubleshooting steps would need to be done on the AD server itself. If this is an issue with the AD server, why would it crop up out of the blue when the firewall was replaced? Makes no sense to me yet.
... View more
05-06-2019
08:25 PM
The Doc does note that you can whitelist via L3 and L7 rules to exempt them from inspections. Though what you say Firepower can do is smarter though.
... View more
04-01-2019
08:59 AM
I have started coming across this issue for some of my small clients that are moving to WAN links over 500Mbps as well. One of the options I am looking at is the Cisco RV340 series for my smaller clients. They get 900Mbps throughput and have security licensing and capabilities similar to that of the MX's. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/rv345-dual-gigabit-wan-vpn-router/index.html https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/routers/csbr/RV345/Administration_Guide/EN/b_RV345_RV345P_EN_AG.pdf Hoping that Meraki eventually builds a 1Gbps MX for small clients soon, though.
... View more
02-12-2019
08:20 AM
Does anyone know if there is a way to restrict client VPN connectivity to allow only specific computers, when it comes to Meraki? Is it possible to do this with RADIUS perhaps? I have a client that has a policy to only allow AD domain joined computers to connect to the VPN, and if Meraki/RADIUS/?, can do this I would like to sell them on Meraki. They are currently using a Sonicwall TZ400 for their firewall and an SRA1600 vpn appliance of which handles the required setup currently itself. Thanks, Ryan
... View more
09-04-2018
01:22 PM
Had anyone ever done this before? I cannot find any info on this at all.
... View more
08-16-2018
12:32 PM
5 Kudos
Has anyone heard whether Meraki is going to update their client VPN capabilities so that they are able to meet compliance standards. I have a client that just had one of their audit completed, and of course it failed due to their MX only being able to support IKEv1 aggressive mode. They are looking to replace the MX now with a brand that can meet compliance. Would have thought Meraki would of had client VPN that would pass an audit taken care of by now. Pretty disappointing.
... View more
08-15-2018
09:58 PM
1 Kudo
Is it me or does it seem unusual that the bandwidth limit is only 250Mbps for MX64/65 security appliances? It just seems artificially low. I have some smaller clients that have 1Gbps fiber now, that only have between 10-20 devices, and they cannot even use their bandwidth fully, unless they were to get an MX250....again for less that 20 client devices. Seems a bit ludicrous. I should be able to set the bandwidth to a full 1Gbps, since the WAN port is a gig ethernet port. I can do this on z1's. Why not MX64's?
... View more
02-01-2018
03:24 PM
having MFA/OTP built in would be nice still. I come from a SonicWALL background and this feature was built into the appliances. Strange regarding AES, as I spoke to Meraki support not long aog this week, and they state the following is used for client VPN: L2TP IKEv1 PAP authentication 3DES encryption SHA1 hashing Aggressive Mode Definitely could be better and why it isn't in this day in age, who knows.
... View more
02-01-2018
02:38 PM
2 Kudos
- Multi factor / one-time password authentication capability. - Stronger everything security-wise: AES encryption, anything better than SHA1 IKEv2, etc...AND configurable with however I would like based on my needs, not stuck with just one way of doing it ike we currently have. These really have to be huge requests I imagine, especially for compliance needs. I really do hope this is already on the Meraki roadmap for their MX firmware.
... View more
11-15-2017
01:03 PM
If you need to deploy security at the edge quickly, MX appliances with Adv. Sec. licensing is the way to go. Deployment is very simple and very fast. AMP does a great job of catching malicious threats. Layer that with the IPS and Content Filtering to protect your network from exploits and other web based threats. We are looking into deploying ThreatGrid for analyzing unknown files and their behavior.
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 773 | |
| 2 | 825 | |
| 1 | 825 |
