Meraki

Community
  • About Karll

About Karll

Re: MX95 as a concentrator

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎May 28 2025 10:37 PM
‎May 28 2025 10:37 PM
I forgot to mention that the MX95 would be a dedicated concentrator with no clients connected to it directly. It would be at the DC not HQ.  ... View more

Re: MX95 as a concentrator

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎May 28 2025 6:18 AM
‎May 28 2025 6:18 AM
Split tunnel for the 50 5G/4G sites since it would be hard to do a full tunnel.   The potentional expansion (new sites) would probably be split tunnel as well. At least that makes the most sense to me.  ... View more

Re: MX95 as a concentrator

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎May 28 2025 4:09 AM
‎May 28 2025 4:09 AM
I think user capacity would be relevant only for the MX on the remote site, no? Not directly for the concentrator.  ... View more

Re: MX95 as a concentrator

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎May 28 2025 3:53 AM
‎May 28 2025 3:53 AM
Thanks for reply.    Could you explain why'd you choose MX105?   Technically, we'd barely fit in with MX85 (100 max rec. tunnels, 1Gbps VPN throughput) even with the expansion...  ... View more

MX95 as a concentrator

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎May 28 2025 2:05 AM
2 Kudos
‎May 28 2025 2:05 AM
2 Kudos
Hello everybody,    Thinking about a possible SD-WAN solution and wanted to double check if it makes sense.  50 Small 4G/5G Spoke sites (aprox. 10 people per site) Possible future expansion  - 20 small sites, 20 medium sized offices (40 clients), 1 HQ (300 clients).    Traffic towards concentrator should not exceed 1.5Gbps.    I've checked the sizing principles and MX95 has Recommended Maximum Site to Site VPN Tunnel Count: 250 and Multi-Tunnel VPN Throughput: 2.5 Gbps.    I'd say MX95 HA cluster is a perfect fit with some room to grow still. The bigger MXs are bit of an overkill.    What are your thoughts? ... View more
Labels:

Re: MX95 Throughput discrepancy

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎May 22 2025 5:54 AM
‎May 22 2025 5:54 AM
Could be, yeah.   Still, I'd say they should clearly update the documentation. Don't wanna mess up sizing, etc. And If multiple related/similar values are shown in the same article, they should also include more detailed description of each.   Thanks for the reply, tho. ... View more

MX95 Throughput discrepancy

by in Security & SD-WAN
‎May 22 2025 4:49 AM
‎May 22 2025 4:49 AM
Hello,   Meraki documentation has different values for throughput and I am not sure which is right.   Datasheet (Last updated Jan 15, 2025) https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/MX_Overviews_and_Specifications/MX95%2F%2F105_Datasheet says Maximum VPN throughput: 2.5 Gbps Max site-to-site VPN throughput: 800 Mbps   MX sizing princeiple (Last updated Apr 10, 2025) https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/MX_Sizing_Information/MX_Sizing_Principles says Single Tunnel VPN Throughput RFC2544 1400 Byte : 2.0 Gbps Multi-Tunnel VPN Throughput RFC2544 1400 Byte: 2.5 Gbps   MX95/MX105 Series Hardware Installation Guide ( Last updated Feb 18, 2025) https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/MX_Installation_Guides/MX95%2F%2FMX105_Series_Hardware_Installation_Guide says Maximum VPN Throughput: 1 Gbps   Which is right? ... View more
Labels:
My Top Kudoed Posts
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.