Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Become a member of the Cisco Meraki Community today
Get answers from our community of experts in record time.
Join nowAbout timmyver
Community Record
8
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Apr 9 2025
10:59 PM
No, i'm talking about Port Profiles, but i see they are merging the Port Profiles together with the smartPorts.
... View more
Apr 9 2025
2:44 AM
Hey, I'm managed a network of about 140 different sites and would we are busy segmenting this, so Port profiles look like a very good solutions. I already created different organization wide port profiles and used this this in our default template and that works great and easy. Now the big catch, i also need a Port profile with and access policy. I can't create an organization wide port with because it's not supported. so I've created the port profile inside of the template but when i try to assign it to a port I'm getting the error : "Port profile must belong to the same organization or switch group as the port it is assigned to" which doesn't make sense because it's already part of the organization. If i go to the Port profiles of the network and want to create the port on the network level I'm getting the error : "A port profile may not be created from a template child network." Which makes sense but still I'm stuck in between to create the port profiles
... View more
Mar 25 2025
2:54 AM
Thanks for the answers. I will long to test the StrongSwan solution. although i find i a bit of pity that the product is so limited. I can't do outbound NAT(function as a Internet Gateway). I can't do NAT on external VPN or work as a VPN concentrator. So to be honest i don't see a lot of added value in deploying a VMX to Azure instead of VPN Gateway or StrongSwan. In a small environment, i have another customer with 140 sites, that's different story off-course.
... View more
Mar 24 2025
11:11 AM
Hey, it's a full mesh setup to be clear. so yes all sites are hubs. To connection to the remote site works, but it's a matter of letting the other hubs route everything over the one hub in azure. That way we only need one VPN connection to the customers site. i don't see anywhere it's not supported, but i also don't have the option eanble the VPN NAT, although there should be an option to set 'VPN subnet translation' enabled
... View more
Mar 24 2025
10:30 AM
Hey everybody, i have a hub and spoke setup with full-mesh over 4 different sites now we need a Non-meraki vpn to a customer site. So replacing it with an MX is not option. Configuring it with a Non-meraki firewall is not a problem but then i would need connectivity from all the spokes to the non-meraki and the non-meraki needs to be NAtted. Because there current range is already used in our environment.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
3rd Party VPN
-
Auto VPN
-
Azure
Mar 20 2025
1:14 PM
Hey we could do it with deny rules but even then the route is injected in our routing Table and advertised through our whole VWAN and we want to avoid that.
... View more
Mar 20 2025
12:55 AM
Hey, we have a setup with a VMX in the cloud which servers as a Hub for our Remote Site(Spokes). So it's Hub and spoke setup with different site. Now for a new site we want to have a VLAN from site 1 connected to a VLAN in Site 2 directly without connecting it out Hub and Spoke. So that those VLAN's are separated from our Environment. From the gui it doesn't look possible, does anybody have a idea. For the routing we use BGP to our Virtual Wan in Azure so we don't want the route injected to our Global Virtual WAN.
... View more
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
