Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Tim_Patrick_ADS
Community Record
19
Posts
6
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Apr 20 2022
8:15 AM
2 Kudos
I set up a test lab and am able to replicate the issue 16.16 causes bad SD-WAN latency and packet loss rolling back to 15.44 and the problem resolves. Pushing on TAC
... View more
Apr 20 2022
8:14 AM
I created a new test network since I am not getting reliable data form my user. I have an MX64 running 16.16 when in MS teams the audio quality was bad it would cut out freeze kick up poor audio quality messages over and over. I also did a continues ping to a server in my data center (not the real IP bellow). You can see the results at 16.16 then the window of the MX rebooting to roll back to 15.44 and the change in latency and packet loss. I have a case open with TACX but wanted to bring this to other peoples attention. Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=126 Request timed out. Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=126 Request timed out. Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=126 Request timed out. Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=126 Request timed out. Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=226ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=126 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126 Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=126
... View more
Apr 18 2022
7:42 AM
My users have been non communicative if this helped, I have migrated two more sites to 16.16 from 15.44 this weekend to see if they have the same performance issues so far that have not so it could have been a strange anomaly at that site.
... View more
Apr 14 2022
6:29 PM
We have a small handful of sites on the 16.16 code and we had some reports of performance issues, horrible team audio quality, videos becoming choppy, digital signage not playing audio and video in sync, as well as latency issues for some client-server manufacturing applications hosted between locations. We went down the usual suspects looking for congestion, internet circuit issues etc.. While looking at the newest site still coming online I noticed nothing was showing in the traffic analytics, this makes me wonder if NBAR or something else is causing issues with packet classification and QoS . We have just downgraded to 15.44 I will post an update in the AM when I hear back from my users
... View more
Aug 12 2021
6:20 AM
Same issue, same work around solution.
... View more
Mar 4 2021
9:55 AM
Except when every single URL is coming up miss classified, and when you remove that category they all move to the next category.
... View more
Feb 18 2021
2:06 PM
Yes we are all in the same Org I am going to open a ticket thanks all
... View more
Feb 18 2021
2:04 PM
20+ hours for support it was a high priority ticket, It is now working correctly little to no feedback from support as to what or why.
... View more
Feb 18 2021
8:34 AM
1 Kudo
When you talk about clients roaming between buildings with a hand off are you referring to keeping an active session like a voice call up and running or do you mean the users having to re-authenticate through something like captive portal? If your talking about a voice call staying up assuming you have sufficient coverage between the buildings you likely want to look at features like Layer 3 roaming or Layer 3 roaming with a concentrator in the SSID configuration. If your talking about not having the users re-authenticate to the captive portal every time they go to a new Network this may be achievable if you move all of the AP's to a single Network container though I had mixed results with this. We choose to deploy a Radius server tied to our PKI infrastructure so clients can roam between facilities with out being prompted to login at each site via the Meraki captive portal.
... View more
Feb 18 2021
7:52 AM
2 Kudos
It all depends on how your looking to use it. The over all deployment is easy enough they are rather close to plug in play to bring online. One of the selling points to Meraki sit he lack of "Nerd Knobs" the GUI is rather intuitive, and for basic deployments that's a positive. Make sure your adding in the on going cloud license cost when determining your solution. The MX platform can provide you DHCP services for your network, as well as content filtering and inbound connection protection.
... View more
Feb 18 2021
6:39 AM
1 Kudo
Some administrators in my Organization have a "Sign out all other sessions" button on their profile under Your active sessions but not every one. Has any one else noticed this, and if so have any ideas how to get it enabled for all of my administrators? We have found prior to 2/17 any ways that when the dashboard gets sluggish cleaning this list up seems to help.
... View more
Feb 18 2021
6:27 AM
Similar issues here in NA this week the dashboard has been extremely slow yesterday pages stopped loading correctly en mass, around 19:00 GMT our dashboard started to work correctly but we then had issues with the content filter categories being corrupt still waiting any response form Cisco/Meraki
... View more
Feb 18 2021
6:25 AM
On 2/17 we started to have issues with web pages not loading correctly. When we went to look into it we discovered the Dashboard issues that many others have also reported. Such as the event log being empty, navigation menus disappearing and other pages loading completely blank. Once the dashboard started working again we discovered the vast majority of our content was being flagged as gambling and their by blocked. We removed the Gambling category and opened a support case with Meraki. We then saw the content blocks moving to Parked domains, again we removed parked domains, and then it went to the Adult content category. As this was at the end of our production day we opted to wait for support to get back to us. Which they still have not 17 hours after the report of the high priority ticket. We confirmed this was happening to MX devices on 14.53 and 14.42 so it was not a code issue. Has any one else experienced this issue?
... View more
Jul 1 2020
7:54 AM
We did this is an option but it's likely an option of last resort as with 90 networks it will become an administrative overhead and it does not appear to roll up into the SAML roles so it would mean compounding the identity island issue.
... View more
Jul 1 2020
6:38 AM
We have 90 locations, each is its own network with an MX, MS’s and MR’s. We have a team that is half desktop support and half network support. I want to be able to give them the ability to move VLAN ports on the switches but not the ability to alter the configuration of the MX. I attempted to do this with SAML and target based access privileges using the TAGS but it appears the TAGS only work at the network level not the device level. Is there a way to give this team access to only the switch configuration and not the entire sites network?
... View more
May 20 2019
11:27 AM
I think I figured the issue out, on NX5K2 the global ospf statement has digest turned on this is forcing switch 2 to expect an MD5 auth. We are working with our data center team to resolve the issue. Switch 1 router ospf 100 router-id 10.10.7.40 redistribute static route-map static-ospf-redist Switch 2 router ospf 100 router-id 10.10.7.41 redistribute static route-map static-ospf-redist area 0.0.0.0 authentication message-digest
... View more
May 17 2019
8:43 AM
Unfortunately only OSPF right now, I used the BGP at my last environment and had good luck with it but this place has complications preventing us from easily moving to BGP.
... View more
May 16 2019
6:24 PM
We have two Nexus 5K's with HSRP between them connected to a pair of MX250's using One Arm running MX14.39 code. NX5K1-SW1 Interface 1/1 description MX250-1 switchport access vlan 1000 vlan 100 ip address 10.10.10.1/29 ip route ospf 100 area 0.0.0.0 hsrp 100 preempt priority 110 ip 10.10.10.3 NX5K1-SW2 Interface 1/1 description MX250-2 switchport access vlan 1000 vlan 100 ip address 10.10.10.2/29 ip route ospf 100 area 0.0.0.0 hsrp 100 priority 110 ip 10.10.10.3 MX250-1 Internet Interface IP address 10.10.10.4/29 VRRP 10.10.10.6 Gateway 10.10.10.3 MX250-2 Internet Interface IP address 10.10.10.5/29 VRRP 10.10.10.6 Gateway 10.10.10.3 OSPF Settings Router ID 10.10.10.6 Area ID 0 Cost 1 Hello 10 Dead 50 MD5 auth Disabled Yet On NX5K-SW1 I have a flood that does not appear to stop of the following OSPF errors. OSPF-4-Auth_ERR: ospf-100 received a packet from 10.10.10.2 on vlan 100 with bad authentication 2 On NX5K-SW2 I have the following errors OSPF-4-Auth_ERR: ospf-100 received a packet from 10.10.10.1 on vlan 100 with bad authentication 0 OSPF-4-Auth_ERR: ospf-100 received a packet from 10.10.10.4 on vlan 100 with bad authentication 0 I have had a TAC case open and it's gone nowhere so I wanted to see if anyone else has this working correctly.
... View more
Oct 30 2018
5:46 AM
I have the same issue, I have installed the incoming webhook connector into my teams channel, used the URL it generated and pointed the Meraki webhook to that URL. The alerts are not being delivered, yet if I use the E-mail address of the channel and set it as an alert recipient from the dashboard those messages do make it in. Has any one gotten this integration working yet?
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1379 | |
| 2 | 2073 | |
| 1 | 1827 | |
| 1 | 1154 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
