Regardless of it making sense or whether there is benefit in it, is it possible. ... View more

the 3rd MGMT tunnel is not a requirement. It was added for visual context of more than 2 tunnels with the same site-to-site endpoints. ... View more

Thank you for your responses. I also appreciate your opinions as well. Allow me to break this down, more.   I have a data center. In this data center, I have a server cluster. This server cluster is behind a Meraki MX that serves as the cluster's gateway to the internet and VPN concentrator for "branch" locations to access via site-to-site VPN connections.   My "branch" locations have 2 VLAN segregated subnets, one for their corporate network and another for their voice network. These VLANs are configured to not route between each other (no inter-vlan routing).   In my data center cluster, I have 2 VLAN segregated subnets; one for their corporate resources and another for their voice resources (PBX). These VLANs are configured to not route between each other (no inter-vlan routing).   I want to create 2 different tunnels. One to keep voice related traffic specific to the voice networks between sites and the other for corporate related traffic specific to corporate related networks between sites. I don't want to intermingle that traffic on 1 tunnel.   The diagram below is a bit more descriptive.   ... View more