If the VPN config has a host name in it then there must be an associated public DNS record for it.  To find where the public DNS is go to mxtoolbox.com and lookup the domain (company.com), the default will return the MX records, but from the dropdown you can select DNS check and it will tell you where the DNS is hosted.  You will then need to log in to that provider's platform and manage the records for your domain. ... View more

You need to switch the DNS record to point to the new IP when you change the primary uplink ... View more

More information for anyone else seeing the issue with MR55s and 27.x   27.2 doesn't fix it, but plugging the power into the laptop does!   Unfortunately the only remaining laptop I have on-site with an Intel Wi-Fi5 chipset, I have forgotten the admin password for, so cannot see the power settings 🙀 but I have two more arriving later this week so will see if there is a fix there.   Good ol' Intel! ... View more

the name will be set on your dns, something like vpn.company.com.  If you look at your DNS records for the domain company.com, you will find a host record (A record) called vpn and this will be set to the old virtual IP address, change it to the new vIP and you should be good to go. ... View more

Are the client VPNs set to go to a name, or IP address, either way, you might need to change the connection setup? ... View more

12.18 out now... ... View more

@PhilipDAth the stack that had issues when I upgraded earlier to 12.16 (from 12.12), was okay when I upgraded to 12.17 last weekend.  It is a stack of three 48 port 210s with 15 routed interfaces. ... View more

Can you connect a Mac directly to the MS250 to eliminate the Cisco SG (or prove it)? ... View more

It was added to the dashboard about 6 months ago and had an issue where some of the information was displayed for the neighbouring port (1 up or down, I can't quite remember) so it was withdrawn within a week.  It does definitely deserve a comeback, @MerakiDave can we find out what happened to the ports page for MXs? ... View more

I bought an AX200 M2 card for $17 including postage and installed it, now I get this:   Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254: Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 11, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 3ms, Average = 2ms   So it is only a major problem with 802.11ac Intel cards and MR55s with 27.1, personally I think that is money well spent rather than more hours debugging Meraki code...😫   As a bonus it connects at 1.2Gbps rather than the ~800Mbps of the 820 chipset 😎 ... View more

We use bridge mode to a VLAN that only has the payment devices on. ... View more

I love the space around your frames, we're lucky if we can get behind most of ours and if we can, you have to get through all the cables that for whatever reason run across your path... ... View more

 Welcome to the friendliest community I've found.  I started coming here when we were new to Meraki and asked a lot of questions, we now have about 150 Meraki devices of several types and love the ease of accessing the assorted features it provides.  If you have any issues or aren't sure about something, just create a post and you will surely be steered in the right direction 🙂 ... View more

I think you drop the R, so LIC-MX84-SDW-1Y ... View more

12.17 is out now but the only listed fix is for the MS390 series:   Bug fixes MS390 DHCP server may stop working after DHCP fixed assignment or custom option configurations ... View more

I think the diagram is very confusing with the voice VLAN appearing to go to what I assume are the MXs and then not really anywhere.   You have Azure on a LAN interface on the Palo Altos and a WAN interface for unknown traffic.  As @PhilipDAth said, what are you trying to achieve,  why do you want the MXs, is it just for the voice traffic, and if so goes much voice traffic do you have that requires dedicated MX hardware?  We use Cisco ISRs for SIP trunk termination as they have hardware resources for transcoding etc. ... View more

Yes it can be in the same organisation and it would have it's own network.  Each network can only have one MX config (including one HA pair). ... View more

It is more like an enterprise license.  A VMX is designed to allow an Azure or AWS network of servers connect to a Meraki SD-WAN that includes your existing sites and clients.  It isn't designed for end user protection as you wouldn't usually have clients behind it (perhaps cloud VDIs, but that would be the only case I can think of). ... View more

I don't see the issue, if you have two HA pairs that can't be in series, then what you have is what you need.  We've had a similar setup for years and never had any issues, it just works.   For those that need to know, we have HA pairs from two different vendors and run VPNs from both, traditionally one with the site to site and the other with the primary client VPN.  We did briefly have three HA pairs in parallel, but that was just too much 🤣 ... View more

Well, this evening I upgraded a stack of three MS210s that have L3 routing for about 10 VLANs.  After going from 12.12 to 12.16, only 2-3 of the VLANs routed outside of the switch stack through the MX HA pair and over the AutoVPN to other sites.  All nodes could be pinged from the dashboard but not from beyond.  The APs also reported DNS and other errors, showing 50% orange.  I left it for a couple of hours to see if it sorted itself out, rebooted the MXs and in the end downgraded to 12.12.  Everything sprang back to life, so be careful with 12.16, on L3 210 stacks anyway, might well work with L2 or non stacked L3.    Now where did I put that saw and plane? ... View more

I thought @Billy254 was referring to physical security, like a server or corporate PC has, which I don't believe the MR30H has. ... View more