Won't Meraki support Web-auth + 802.1x?

Solved
KSM
Here to help

Won't Meraki support Web-auth + 802.1x?

 

Hi

 

I need help with my current setup...

 

Topology: MR -> BB -> ISE

 

Condition: When connecting to SSID, MR first opens "Splash page", and then enter ISE local db account in ID/PW input field. Then, if 802.1X authentication succeeds, I want to be assigned VLAN 108.
However, if authentication fails, it is isolated to VLAN 107.

 

1. I heard that the above condition only works with MAC authentication. Is that true?
2. Meraki doesn't support Webauth + 802.1x..?
3. Is there no way to utilize isolated VLAN?

1 Accepted Solution
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Hi,

 

1 - Yes, the condition you described typically works with MAC authentication.

2 - No, Meraki does not support it.

3 - No, It's not possible for Meraki Wifi.

 

Take a look at this document.

 

https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-knowledge-base/how-to-integrate-meraki-networks-with-ise/ta-...

 

Enabling MAC-based access control on an SSID - Cisco Meraki Documentation

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Hi,

 

1 - Yes, the condition you described typically works with MAC authentication.

2 - No, Meraki does not support it.

3 - No, It's not possible for Meraki Wifi.

 

Take a look at this document.

 

https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-knowledge-base/how-to-integrate-meraki-networks-with-ise/ta-...

 

Enabling MAC-based access control on an SSID - Cisco Meraki Documentation

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
KSM
Here to help

@alemabrahao Thank you for your reply!

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.