Hi, one of the schools we look after has had a new install of a stack of two Meraki MS-250 switches, and a number of MR44 WiFi access points. The school want a guest SSID setting up.
The network has an IP range of 172.16.80.0 - 172.16.83.254, subnet 255.255.252.0, gateway 172.16.83.254
We have a DHCP scope for clients (this is external and not sourced from the switch) that gives out 172.16.81.1 to 172.16.82.254 (172.16.80.x used for servers, switches, printers etc., and 172.16.83.x currently not being used), they all use VLAN 60.
The head wants to introduce a guest WiFi network, but has been advised by the local authority that he must be able to monitor/log what is accessed (using the school's local filtering equipment), therefore we won't be able to set up the built in Meraki guest option where clients get a 10.0.0.0 address, because as far as we can see, all visited sites on the guest SSID would appear on the IP address of the WiFi access point used, with no way of separating it (this option would be perfect otherwise).
I understand the switches support Layer 3 routing - I have no experience at all at this level, so could someone look at what I've got in my head (below) and tell me if it's possible?
Basically, I was thinking that we might be able to tag the guest SSID with it's own VLAN (for instance, VLAN 61) and then, using the built in DHCP server in the switch, have a scope for this VLAN 61 on giving out addresses of 172.16.83.1-172.16.83.100 (utilizing the unused 172.16.83.x range in the network), but (and this is where I'd be completely lost) somehow then send this traffic, which is on the correct IP address but wrong VLAN, across to the correct VLAN (60) and out of the switch in the same way as the normal traffic from VLAN 60.
Is this an option? I understand we that it would otherwise be an option to keep this guest traffic on it's VLAN 61 until it leaves the switch and have something done at the external firewall side, but we don't have much support from the people who provide our internet and firewall links, so if the guest traffic was able to leave the switch on individual addresses of 172.16.83.x, and be in VLAN 60, that would I think do the job.
Thanks for reading, any tips appreciated.