- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Pros and Cons of converting of MX One Arm concentrator mode to Routed Concentrator
Hi Experts,
May I seek your advice regarding the pros and cons of converting one of our MX from One Arm concentrator mode to Routed Concentrator mode.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Good morning @mr_newbie
Please take a read through the below document:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/
I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The mode of the MX is necessarily determined by its purpose (use case).
Therefore, I think it is best to avoid discussing the superiority or inferiority of each mode in a myopic way.
To benefit from the redundancy provided by DC-DC Failover, it must be a One Armed Concentrator.
Therefore, when redundant Primary and Secondary DCs are used in a corporate network, the DC side must use the
One Armed Concentrator.
Datacenter Redundancy (DC-DC Failover) Deployment Guide - Cisco Meraki
https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/Datacenter_Redundancy_(DC-DC_Failover)_Deploym...
Routed Mode is suitable for accommodating Internet connections at branch offices.
To put it another way, One Armed Concentrator cannot accommodate Internet connections.
