Pros and Cons of converting of MX One Arm concentrator mode to Routed Concentrator

mr_newbie
Comes here often

Pros and Cons of converting of MX One Arm concentrator mode to Routed Concentrator

Hi Experts,

 

May I seek your advice regarding the pros and cons of converting one of our MX from One Arm concentrator mode to Routed Concentrator mode.

 

 

2 Replies 2
DarrenOC
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Good morning @mr_newbie 

 

Please take a read through the below document:

 

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/VPN_Concentrator_Deployment_Guide#Operating_Mo...

Darren OConnor | doconnor@resalire.co.uk
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/

I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
MyHomeNWLab
A model citizen

The mode of the MX is necessarily determined by its purpose (use case).
Therefore, I think it is best to avoid discussing the superiority or inferiority of each mode in a myopic way.

 

To benefit from the redundancy provided by DC-DC Failover, it must be a One Armed Concentrator.
Therefore, when redundant Primary and Secondary DCs are used in a corporate network, the DC side must use the

One Armed Concentrator.

 

  Datacenter Redundancy (DC-DC Failover) Deployment Guide - Cisco Meraki
  https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/Datacenter_Redundancy_(DC-DC_Failover)_Deploym...

 

Routed Mode is suitable for accommodating Internet connections at branch offices.
To put it another way, One Armed Concentrator cannot accommodate Internet connections.

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.
Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco account. If you don't yet have a Cisco account, you can sign up.
Labels